Literature DB >> 20394681

The response dynamics of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to simulated blur.

Michael L Risner1, Franklin R Amthor, Timothy J Gawne.   

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are highly sensitive to changes in contrast, which is crucial for the detection of edges in a visual scene. However, in the natural environment, edges do not just vary in contrast, but edges also vary in the degree of blur, which can be caused by distance from the plane of fixation, motion, and shadows. Hence, blur is as much a characteristic of an edge as luminance contrast, yet its effects on the responses of RGCs are largely unexplored.We examined the responses of rabbit RGCs to sharp edges varying by contrast and also to high-contrast edges varying by blur. The width of the blur profile ranged from 0.73 to 13.05 deg of visual angle. For most RGCs, blurring a high-contrast edge produced the same pattern of reduction of response strength and increase in latency as decreasing the contrast of a sharp edge. In support of this, we found a significant correlation between the amount of blur required to reduce the response by 50% and the size of the receptive fields, suggesting that blur may operate by reducing the range of luminance values within the receptive field. These RGCs cannot individually encode for blur, and blur could only be estimated by comparing the responses of populations of neurons with different receptive field sizes. However, some RGCs showed a different pattern of changes in latency and magnitude with changes in contrast and blur; these neurons could encode blur directly.We also tested whether the response of a RGC to a blurred edge was linear, that is, whether the response of a neuron to a sharp edge was equal to the response to a blurred edge plus the response to the missing spatial components that were the difference between a sharp and blurred edge. Brisk-sustained cells were more linear; however, brisk-transient cells exhibited both linear and nonlinear behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20394681     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523810000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  7 in total

1.  Response dynamics of bullfrog ON-OFF RGCs to different stimulus durations.

Authors:  Lei Xiao; Pu-Ming Zhang; Si Wu; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; John T Siegwart; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  An opponent dual-detector spectral drive model of emmetropization.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Separability of stimulus parameter encoding by on-off directionally selective rabbit retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Nowak; Allan C Dobbins; Timothy J Gawne; Norberto M Grzywacz; Franklin R Amthor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Coding Properties of Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells with Dual-Peak Patterns with Respect to Stimulus Intervals.

Authors:  Ru-Jia Yan; Hai-Qing Gong; Pu-Ming Zhang; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Effects of tDCS-like electrical stimulation on retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Christianne E Strang; Mary Katherine Ray; Mary M Boggiano; Franklin R Amthor
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2018-08-27

7.  Effects of dopamine on response properties of ON-OFF RGCs in encoding stimulus durations.

Authors:  Lei Xiao; Pu-Ming Zhang; Hai-Qing Gong; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.