Literature DB >> 20393875

Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data.

Deborah A Fisher1, Janet M Grubber, John M Castor, Cynthia J Coffman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrative procedure code data can estimate colonoscopy utilization; however, determining colonoscopy indication is more difficult as procedure codes do not inherently reflect the purpose (screening, surveillance, diagnosis) of the colonoscopy. AIM: To improve the reported sensitivity (70%) and specificity (72%) of a published algorithm for identifying screening colonoscopies using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data.
METHODS: We validated three algorithms for determining colonoscopy indication using medical records as the gold standard in a national sample of 650 patients. Algorithms used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Medical records were manually abstracted using standardized protocols.
RESULTS: The best algorithm had 83% sensitivity and 76% specificity for screening indication. Over 99% of colonoscopy CPT codes corresponded to a colonoscopy in the medical record.
CONCLUSIONS: VHA procedure codes are very accurate for colonoscopy utilization; however, algorithms to ascertain indication have only moderate accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393875     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  4 in total

1.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total
  36 in total

1.  Modestly increased use of colonoscopy when copayments are waived.

Authors:  Shabnam Khatami; Lei Xuan; Rolando Roman; Song Zhang; Charles McConnel; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Pitfalls of using administrative data for research.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Accuracy of administrative claims data for polypectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wyse; Lawrence Joseph; Alan N Barkun; Maida J Sewitch
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.

Authors:  Lina D Song; Joseph P Newhouse; Xabier Garcia-De-Albeniz; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Validation of 5 key colonoscopy-related data elements from Ontario health administrative databases compared to the clinical record: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Rinku Sutradhar; Ning Liu; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Prevalence of colonoscopy before age 50.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Robert T Greenlee; Eric Johnson; Azadeh Stark; Sheila Weinmann; Aruna Kamineni; Kenneth Adams; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Assessing the effectiveness of a cancer screening test in the presence of another screening modality.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Qualitative study of physician perspectives on classifying screening and nonscreening colonoscopy using administrative health data: adding practice does not make perfect.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Robert Hilsden; Lawrence Joseph; Linda Rabineck; Lawrence Paszat; Alain Bitton; Mary Anne Cooper
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.