Literature DB >> 20393313

Spinocerebellar ataxia: patient and health professional perspectives on whether and how patents affect access to clinical genetic testing.

Ashton Powell1, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Robert Cook-Deegan.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for spinocerebellar ataxia is used in diagnosis of rare movement disorders. Such testing generally does not affect treatment, but confirmation of mutations in a known gene can confirm diagnosis and end an often years-long quest for the cause of distressing and disabling symptoms. Through interviews and a web forum hosted by the National Ataxia Foundation, patients and health professionals related their experiences with the effect of patents on access to genetic testing for spinocerebellar ataxia. In the United States, Athena Diagnostics holds either a patent or an exclusive license to a patent in the case of six spinocerebellar ataxia variants (spinocerebellar ataxia 1-3 and 6-8) and two other hereditary ataxias (Friedreich's Ataxia and Early Onset Ataxia). Athena has enforced its exclusive rights to spinocerebellar ataxia-related patents by sending notification letters to multiple laboratories offering genetic testing for inherited neurological conditions, including spinocerebellar ataxia. Roughly half of web forum respondents had decided not to get genetic tests. Price, coverage and reimbursement by insurers and health plans, and fear of genetic discrimination were the main reasons cited for deciding not to get tested. Price was cited as an access concern by the physicians, and as sole US provider, coverage and reimbursement depend on having payment agreements between Athena and payers. In cases in which payers do not reimburse, the patient is responsible for payment, although some patients can apply to the voluntary Athena Access and Patient Protection Plan offered by the company.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393313      PMCID: PMC3138714          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d67e44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  25 in total

Review 1.  Cerebellar ataxia and gluten sensitivity: a rare but possible cause of ataxia, even in childhood.

Authors:  N Gordon
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  The sword of Damocles: the psychosocial impact of familial spinocerebellar ataxia in South Africa.

Authors:  C de Villiers; K Weskamp; A Bryer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-05-31

3.  Absence of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease within ataxic patients in the Czech population.

Authors:  P O Bauer; A Zumrova; V Matoska; T Marikova; S Krilova; A Boday; B Singh; P Goetz
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.089

4.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: gaze-evoked and vertical nystagmus, Purkinje cell degeneration, and variable age of onset.

Authors:  C M Gomez; R M Thompson; J T Gammack; S L Perlman; W B Dobyns; C L Truwit; D S Zee; H B Clark; J H Anderson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale.

Authors:  T Schmitz-Hübsch; S Tezenas du Montcel; L Baliko; J Berciano; S Boesch; C Depondt; P Giunti; C Globas; J Infante; J-S Kang; B Kremer; C Mariotti; B Melegh; M Pandolfo; M Rakowicz; P Ribai; R Rola; L Schöls; S Szymanski; B P van de Warrenburg; A Dürr; T Klockgether; Roberto Fancellu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Frequency of SCA1, SCA2, SCA3/MJD, SCA6, SCA7, and DRPLA CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in patients with hereditary spinocerebellar ataxia from Chinese kindreds.

Authors:  B Tang; C Liu; L Shen; H Dai; Q Pan; L Jing; S Ouyang; J Xia
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2000-04

7.  Clinical feature profile of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1-8 predicts genetically defined subtypes.

Authors:  Matthias Maschke; Gary Oehlert; Ting-Dong Xie; Susan Perlman; Sub H Subramony; Neeraj Kumar; Louis J Ptacek; Christopher M Gomez
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 8.  Pathways to motor incoordination: the inherited ataxias.

Authors:  Franco Taroni; Stefano DiDonato
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Frequency analysis and clinical characterization of spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 in Korean patients.

Authors:  Won Yong Lee; Dong Kyu Jin; Myung Ryurl Oh; Ji Eun Lee; Seng Mi Song; Eun Ah Lee; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Jin Sang Chung; Kwang Ho Lee
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2003-06

10.  Utilization and diagnostic yield of neurogenetic testing at a tertiary care facility.

Authors:  Kerstin L Edlefsen; Jonathan F Tait; Mark H Wener; Michael Astion
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  Patents in genomics and human genetics.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher Heaney
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Karen J Ruth; Yu-Ning Wong; Katen C McCully; Christina M Rybak; Neal J Meropol; Michael J Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetics' influence on patient experiences with a rare chronic disorder: a photovoice study of living with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

Authors:  Pamela Holtzclaw Williams; Lucinda Shore; Marvin Sineath; Jim Quill; Barbara Warner; Jamila Keith; Deirdre Walker; Sara Wienke; Susan Flavin; Charlie Strange
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.208

5.  Cystic Fibrosis Patents: A Case Study of Successful Licensing.

Authors:  Mollie A Minear; Cristina Kapustij; Kaeleen Boden; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  LES Nouv       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Angela Bradbury; Courtney Storm; Jon F Merz; Kevin E Noonan; Rebecca Spence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  DNA patents and diagnostics: not a pretty picture.

Authors:  Julia Carbone; E Richard Gold; Bhaven Sampat; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Lori Knowles; Misha Angrist; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.

Authors:  Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova; James Buchanan; Heleen Vellekoop; Simone Huygens; Matthijs Versteegh; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken; László Szilberhorn; Tamás Zelei; Balázs Nagy; Sarah Wordsworth; Apostolos Tsiachristas
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.686

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.