Literature DB >> 20393104

The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions.

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, Mick P Couper, Eleanor Singer, Carrie A Levin, Floyd J Fowler, Sonja Ziniel, Peter A Ubel, Angela Fagerlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient involvement is required before patients' preferences can be reflected in the medical care they receive. Furthermore, patients are a vital link between physicians' assessments of patients' needs and actual implementation of appropriate care. Yet no study has specifically examined how and when a representative sample of patients considered, discussed, and made medical decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To identify decision prevalence and decision-making processes regarding 1) initiation of prescription medications for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or depression; 2) screening tests for colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer; and 3) surgeries for knee or hip replacement, cataracts, or lower back pain.
DESIGN: Computer-assisted telephone interview survey.
SETTING: Nationally representative sample of US adults in households with telephones. PARTICIPANTS: 3010 English-speaking adults age 40 and older identified using a stratified random sample of telephone numbers. MEASUREMENTS: Estimated prevalence of medical decisions, defined as the patient having initiated medications, been screened, or had surgery within the past 2 years or having discussed these actions with a health care provider during the same interval, as well as decision-specific data regarding patient knowledge, attitudes and patient-provider interactions.
RESULTS: 82.2% of the target population reported making at least 1 medical decision in the preceding 2 years. The proportion of decisions resulting in patient action varied dramatically both across decision type (medications [61%] v. screening [83%] v. surgery [44%]; P < 0.001), and within each category (e.g., blood pressure medications [76%] v. cholesterol medications [55%] vs. depression medications [48%]; P < 0.001). Respondents reported making more decisions if they had a primary care provider or poorer health status and fewer decisions if they had lower education, were male, or were under age 50. Limitations. Retrospective self-reports may incorporate recall biases.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical decisions with significant life-saving, quality of life, and cost implications are a pervasive part of life for most US adults. The DECISIONS dataset provides a rich research environment for exploring factors influencing when and how patients make common medical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393104     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09353792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  36 in total

1.  The role of perceived benefits and costs in patients' medical decisions.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Mick P Couper; Angela Fagerlin; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Peter A Ubel; John Van Hoewyk; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales.

Authors:  Suzanne Brodney; Floyd J Fowler; Michael J Barry; Yuchiao Chang; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Shared decision making, contextualized.

Authors:  Robert L Ferrer; James M Gill
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  From informed consent to informed request: do we need a new gold standard?

Authors:  Ben Moulton; Peter Alf Collins; Nick Burns-Cox; Angela Coulter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The DECISIONS study: synopsis of evidence for shared decision-making and quality patient-provider communication.

Authors:  Molly Jean Ferguson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  A Look at Person- and Family-Centered Care Among Older Adults: Results from a National Survey [corrected].

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Adolescent and parent perspectives on medical decision-making for chronic illness.

Authors:  Jennie G David; Mindy S Lo; David A Langer
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachel Zeuner; Dominick L Frosch; Marie D Kuzemchak; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Towards personalizing treatment for depression : developing treatment values markers.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Knashawn H Morales; Mark Cary; Joseph J Gallo; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.