Literature DB >> 20392447

Differentiation of ankle sprain motion and common sporting motion by ankle inversion velocity.

Vikki Wing-Shan Chu1, Daniel Tik-Pui Fong, Yue-Yan Chan, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung, Kwai-Yau Fung, Kai-Ming Chan.   

Abstract

This study investigated the ankle inversion and inversion velocity between various common motions in sports and simulated sprain motion, in order to provide a threshold for ankle sprain risk identification. The experiment was composed of two parts: firstly, ten male subjects wore a pair of sport shoes and performed ten trials of running, cutting, jump-landing and stepping-down motions. Secondly, five subjects performed five trials of simulated sprain motion by a supination sprain simulator. The motions were analyzed by an eight-camera motion capture system at 120 Hz. A force plate was employed to record the vertical ground reaction force and locate the foot strike time for common sporting motions. Ankle inversion and inversion velocity were calculated by a standard lower extremity biomechanics calculation procedure. Profiles of vertical ground reaction force, ankle inversion angle and ankle inversion velocity were obtained. Results suggested that the ankle was kept in an everted position during the stance. The maximum ankle inversion velocity ranged from 22.5 to 85.1 degrees/s and 114.0 to 202.5 degrees/s for the four tested motions and simulated sprain motion respectively. Together with the ankle inversion velocity reported in the injury case (623 degrees/s), a threshold of ankle inversion velocity of 300 degrees/s was suggested for the identification of ankle sprain. The information obtained in this study can serve as a basis for the development of an active protection apparatus for reducing ankle sprain injury. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392447     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of 3 ankle braces with and without free rotation in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Martin Alfuth; Dieter Klein; Raphael Koch; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Function of ankle ligaments for subtalar and talocrural joint stability during an inversion movement - an in vitro study.

Authors:  Lu Li; Albert Gollhofer; Heinz Lohrer; Nadja Dorn-Lange; Guiseppe Bonsignore; Dominic Gehring
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  The Effect of Ankle Bracing on Kinematics in Simulated Sprain and Drop Landings: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Alison N Agres; Marios Chrysanthou; Peter C Raffalt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Kinematic analysis of a televised medial ankle sprain.

Authors:  Francesca E Wade; Kam-Ming Mok; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2018-03-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.