Literature DB >> 20392432

To operate or not to operate? A multi-method analysis of decision-making in emergency surgery.

Peter Szatmary1, Sonal Arora, Nick Sevdalis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to decide when to operate and when not to operate is a key surgical skill. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting that decision.
METHODS: In phase 1, semistructured interviews were used to investigate how expert surgeons decide when to operate. In phase 2, clinical case vignettes were constructed, and 22 general surgeons at various stages of their training indicated whether they would operate and their confidence in patient outcomes.
RESULTS: Interviews answers centered on the theme of "patient outcome," which was defined similarly by all surgeons. In phase 2, surgeons chose to operate when they perceived the outcome with an operation to be better than the outcome without. Surgeons with <5 years of experience were less certain about what outcomes might be. These surgeons opted to perform significantly more operations (40 +/- 4%) than surgeons with > or =5 years of experience (18 +/- 2%).
CONCLUSIONS: A subjective, balanced assessment of the likelihood of patient outcome is crucial in deciding whether to operate. Novices face higher degrees of uncertainty, explaining differences in decisions taken. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392432     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Decision-Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study.

Authors:  Louise Hendra; Tim Hendra; Stephen J Parker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Challenges and potential solutions to the evaluation, monitoring, and regulation of surgical innovations.

Authors:  Derek J Roberts; David A Zygun; Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Peter D Faris; Matthew T James; Kelly J Mrklas; Brenda D Hemmelgarn; Braden Manns; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Systematic review and narrative synthesis of surgeons' perception of postoperative outcomes and risk.

Authors:  N M Dilaver; B L Gwilym; R Preece; C P Twine; D C Bosanquet
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 4.  Prioritizing Communication in the Provision of Palliative Care for the Trauma Patient.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cook; David Zonies; Karen Brasel
Journal:  Curr Trauma Rep       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 5.  Decision making in urological surgery.

Authors:  Hamid Abboudi; Kamran Ahmed; Pasha Normahani; May Abboudi; Roger Kirby; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Inner Deliberations of Surgeons Treating Critically-ill Emergency General Surgery Patients: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Shreyus S Kulkarni; Alexandra Briggs; Olivia A Sacks; Matthew R Rosengart; Douglas B White; Amber E Barnato; Andrew B Peitzman; Deepika Mohan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.787

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.