SETTING: The incidence of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is surprisingly high among certain subgroups of patients in industrialized countries. Diagnosis is often difficult and can require costly invasive workup. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe, minimally invasive, accurate, out-patient diagnostic modality for assessing mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy and masses. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of EUS-FNA for diagnosing EPTB. DESIGN: Retrospective 6-year review, including all patients who had evidence of lymphadenopathy or mass on computed tomography scan accessible by EUS and consideration of tuberculosis (TB) in the differential diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 81 potential patients, a total of 20 cases with EPTB diagnosed by EUS-FNA were identified. Necrotizing granulomas had a 58% likelihood of TB vs. 14% for other cytologic findings (P < 0.0001); necrosis was also predictive, with a 44% likelihood of TB vs. 19% (P < 0.0225). EUS-FNA cytology was diagnostic for TB when an African-born patient had necrotizing granulomas (P < 0.0001), and was highly suggestive with necrosis alone (P < 0.0514). Non-necrotizing granulomas were not predictive of TB and an alternative diagnosis was more likely, including sarcoidosis and cancer. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA is a useful diagnostic modality that should be used early in the diagnostic workup of suspected EPTB.
SETTING: The incidence of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is surprisingly high among certain subgroups of patients in industrialized countries. Diagnosis is often difficult and can require costly invasive workup. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe, minimally invasive, accurate, out-patient diagnostic modality for assessing mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy and masses. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of EUS-FNA for diagnosing EPTB. DESIGN: Retrospective 6-year review, including all patients who had evidence of lymphadenopathy or mass on computed tomography scan accessible by EUS and consideration of tuberculosis (TB) in the differential diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 81 potential patients, a total of 20 cases with EPTB diagnosed by EUS-FNA were identified. Necrotizing granulomas had a 58% likelihood of TB vs. 14% for other cytologic findings (P < 0.0001); necrosis was also predictive, with a 44% likelihood of TB vs. 19% (P < 0.0225). EUS-FNA cytology was diagnostic for TB when an African-born patient had necrotizing granulomas (P < 0.0001), and was highly suggestive with necrosis alone (P < 0.0514). Non-necrotizing granulomas were not predictive of TB and an alternative diagnosis was more likely, including sarcoidosis and cancer. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA is a useful diagnostic modality that should be used early in the diagnostic workup of suspected EPTB.
Authors: Hussein Hassan Okasha; Ahmed El-Meligui; Katarzyna M Pawlak; Michał Żorniak; Hassan Atalla; Amr Abou-Elmagd; Sameh Abou-Elenen; Ramy El-Husseiny; Ahmed Alzamzamy Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.628
Authors: Yung Ka Chin; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Daniel de la Iglesia; Jose Lariño-Noia; Ihab Abdulkader-Nallib; Hector Lázare; Susana Rebolledo Olmedo; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 5.742