Literature DB >> 20392003

A hierarchical framework for investigating epiphyte assemblages: networks, meta-communities, and scale.

K C Burns1, G Zotz.   

Abstract

Epiphytes are an important component of many forested ecosystems, yet our understanding of epiphyte communities lags far behind that of terrestrial-based plant communities. This discrepancy is exacerbated by the lack of a theoretical context to assess patterns in epiphyte community structure. We attempt to fill this gap by developing an analytical framework to investigate epiphyte assemblages, which we then apply to a data set on epiphyte distributions in a Panamanian rain forest. On a coarse scale, interactions between epiphyte species and host tree species can be viewed as bipartite networks, similar to pollination and seed dispersal networks. On a finer scale, epiphyte communities on individual host trees can be viewed as meta-communities, or suites of local epiphyte communities connected by dispersal. Similar analytical tools are typically employed to investigate species interaction networks and meta-communities, thus providing a unified analytical framework to investigate coarse-scale (network) and fine-scale (meta-community) patterns in epiphyte distributions. Coarse-scale analysis of the Panamanian data set showed that most epiphyte species interacted with fewer host species than expected by chance. Fine-scale analyses showed that epiphyte species richness on individual trees was lower than null model expectations. Therefore, epiphyte distributions were clumped at both scales, perhaps as a result of dispersal limitations. Scale-dependent patterns in epiphyte species composition were observed. Epiphyte-host networks showed evidence of negative co-occurrence patterns, which could arise from adaptations among epiphyte species to avoid competition for host species, while most epiphyte meta-communities were distributed at random. Application of our "meta-network" analytical framework in other locales may help to identify general patterns in the structure of epiphyte assemblages and their variation in space and time.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392003     DOI: 10.1890/08-2004.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating factors that predict the structure of a commensalistic epiphyte-phorophyte network.

Authors:  Roberto Sáyago; Martha Lopezaraiza-Mikel; Mauricio Quesada; Mariana Yolotl Álvarez-Añorve; Alfredo Cascante-Marín; Jesus Ma Bastida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecological facilitation between two epiphytes through drought mitigation in a subtropical rainforest.

Authors:  Pei-Yu Jian; Feng Sheng Hu; Chiao Ping Wang; Jyh-Min Chiang; Teng-Chiu Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Host specificity in vascular epiphytes: a review of methodology, empirical evidence and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Katrin Wagner; Glenda Mendieta-Leiva; Gerhard Zotz
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Structure of the epiphyte community in a tropical montane forest in SW China.

Authors:  Mingxu Zhao; Nalaka Geekiyanage; Jianchu Xu; Myo Myo Khin; Dian Ridwan Nurdiana; Ekananda Paudel; Rhett Daniel Harrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vascular Epiphyte Diversity Differs with Host Crown Zone and Diameter, but Not Orientation in a Tropical Cloud Forest.

Authors:  Xixi Wang; Wenxing Long; Brandon S Schamp; Xiaobo Yang; Yong Kang; Zhixu Xie; Menghui Xiong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Metapopulation dynamics of the mistletoe and its host in savanna areas with different fire occurrence.

Authors:  Grazielle Sales Teodoro; Eduardo van den Berg; Rafael Arruda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comprehensive checklist of vascular epiphytes of the Atlantic Forest reveals outstanding endemic rates.

Authors:  Leandro Freitas; Alexandre Salino; Luiz Menini Neto; Thaís Elias Almeida; Sara Ribeiro Mortara; João Renato Stehmann; André Marcio Amorim; Elsie Franklin Guimarães; Marcus Nadruz Coelho; Ana Zanin; Rafaela Campostrini Forzza
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.635

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.