Literature DB >> 20391994

Seasonal plankton-fish interactions: light regime, prey phenology, and herring foraging.

Øystein Varpe1, Øyvind Fiksen.   

Abstract

When prey and predator are seasonal migrants, encounters depend on migration phenologies and environmental constraints on predation. Here we investigate the relative contribution of seasonality in irradiance and prey abundance in shaping the rapid seasonal body condition increase of a migrating predator searching visually for its prey: the Norwegian spring-spawning herring, Clupea harengus, feeding on the copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Two main seasonal pulses of prey are available to herring: (1) the parent generation of C. finmarchicus, with peak abundance in March-April, which appear too early to cause the main increase in herring condition; and (2) the abundant offspring generation of C. finmarchicus, with peak abundance in June-July, too late to explain the main increase in body condition. However, a mechanistic model of ingestion rate, including both solar irradiance and prey abundance, predicted seasonal food intake in good accordance with observed herring body condition. This suggests that the seasonality in herring foraging and energy storage is closely linked to the return of longer days in spring, and less dependent on a match or mismatch with seasonal peaks in abundance of their zooplankton prey. Consequently, light related constraints on foraging may make visually searching predators at high latitudes resilient to changes and fluctuations in prey phenology and abundance, but vulnerable to changes in the light regime, such as water clarity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20391994     DOI: 10.1890/08-1817.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of climate-driven mismatches between interdependent phenophases in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Amelia Caffarra; Bridget F O'Neill
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 2.  Strengthening the evidence base for temperature-mediated phenological asynchrony and its impacts.

Authors:  Jelmer M Samplonius; Angus Atkinson; Christopher Hassall; Katharine Keogan; Stephen J Thackeray; Jakob J Assmann; Malcolm D Burgess; Jacob Johansson; Kirsty H Macphie; James W Pearce-Higgins; Emily G Simmonds; Øystein Varpe; Jamie C Weir; Dylan Z Childs; Ella F Cole; Francis Daunt; Tom Hart; Owen T Lewis; Nathalie Pettorelli; Ben C Sheldon; Albert B Phillimore
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Marine plankton phenology and life history in a changing climate: current research and future directions.

Authors:  Rubao Ji; Martin Edwards; David L Mackas; Jeffrey A Runge; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  J Plankton Res       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.455

4.  Differences in lens optical plasticity in two gadoid fishes meeting in the Arctic.

Authors:  Mikael Jönsson; Øystein Varpe; Tomasz Kozłowski; Jørgen Berge; Ronald H H Kröger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Biodiversity and ecosystem function in the Gulf of Maine: pattern and role of zooplankton and pelagic nekton.

Authors:  Catherine L Johnson; Jeffrey A Runge; K Alexandra Curtis; Edward G Durbin; Jonathan A Hare; Lewis S Incze; Jason S Link; Gary D Melvin; Todd D O'Brien; Lou Van Guelpen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of spring temperatures on the strength of selection on timing of reproduction in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp; Arild Husby; Michael Morrisey; Iván de la Hera; Francisco Pulido; Christiaan Both
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Bioenergetics modeling of the annual consumption of zooplankton by pelagic fish feeding in the Northeast Atlantic.

Authors:  Eneko Bachiller; Kjell Rong Utne; Teunis Jansen; Geir Huse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Nightjars may adjust breeding phenology to compensate for mismatches between moths and moonlight.

Authors:  Philina A English; Joseph J Nocera; David J Green
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Predation risk alters life history strategies in an oceanic copepod.

Authors:  Kristina Øie Kvile; Dag Altin; Lotte Thommesen; Josefin Titelman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.499

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.