Literature DB >> 20391893

Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of an underhand volleyball serve.

Antonios K Travlos1.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of practice composition on acquisition and transfer of the underhand volleyball serve in a standard high school physical education setting. 72 middle-school students (M age = 14.1 yr., SD = 0.7) were selected and assigned to six groups: five experimental (Random, Serial, Blocked, Constant, Specific), and one Control group all pretested. The five experimental groups received 45 acquisition trials over three class periods. Directional quantitative knowledge of results was provided to the students after each trial. After a 72-hr. retention interval, all groups performed 15 underhand volleyball serves without knowledge of results. Analyses indicated (a) better acquisition in the Specific and Constant groups relative to the Serial, Random, and Blocked groups, and (b) significantly superior transfer performance in the Specific and Random groups relative to the Serial, Blocked, Constant, and Control groups. This provides partial support for specificity of learning and contextual interference hypotheses. Practice in accord with the contextual interference hypothesis permits differentiations among varied practice schedules only during transfer.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20391893     DOI: 10.2466/PMS.110.1.298-312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  7 in total

1.  Effects of practice variability on spinal manipulation learning.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Laura Mendoza; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-01-25

2.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Too much of a good thing: random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits.

Authors:  Asif Ali; Bradley Fawver; Jingu Kim; Jeffrey Fairbrother; Christopher M Janelle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-10

4.  Effects of variability of practice in music: a pilot study on fast goal-directed movements in pianists.

Authors:  Marc Bangert; Anna Wiedemann; Hans-Christian Jabusch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Dissociable effects of practice variability on learning motor and timing skills.

Authors:  Baptiste Caramiaux; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Marcelo M Wanderley; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Learning Multiple Movements in Parallel-Accurately and in Random Order, or Each with Added Noise?

Authors:  Julius B Apidogo; Johannes Burdack; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Interleaved practice benefits implicit sequence learning and transfer.

Authors:  Julia M Schorn; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.