Literature DB >> 20391872

Blocked and random practice organization in the learning of rhythmic dance step sequences.

Maurizio Bertollo1, Marika Berchicci, Attilio Carraro, Silvia Comani, Claudio Robazza.   

Abstract

This study investigated the role played by Blocked (low contextual interference) and Random (high contextual interference) schedules in the acquisition of rhythmic footstep sequences by adolescent females (N = 40, M age = 15.8 yr., SD = 1.3). After a baseline assessment (T0), motor learning was assessed after six sessions (T1) in terms of the participants' ability to reproduce the step sequences using visual and auditory guidance. A retention test (T2) also occurred 21 days after T1. Analysis of variance yielded significant main effects of group, test, and an interaction. Both groups improved performance from T0 to T1, but the Blocked schedule group outperformed the Random schedule group at T1. Significant group differences were not observed at T2. The Random schedule group's performance did not significantly change from T1 to T2, and the Blocked schedule group's performance significantly decreased. Apparently, the learning of rhythmic footstep dance sequences was not influenced by practice organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20391872     DOI: 10.2466/PMS.110.1.77-84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  3 in total

1.  Methodology Matters: The Impact of Research Design on Conversational Entrainment Outcomes.

Authors:  Camille J Wynn; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  The role of the practice order: A systematic review about contextual interference in children.

Authors:  Judith V Graser; Caroline H G Bastiaenen; Hubertus J A van Hedel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.