OBJECTIVE: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) is a validated instrument for assessing organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Trained physicians must complete it, thus limiting utility where this is impossible. METHODS: We developed and pilot tested a self-assessed organ damage instrument, the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ), in 37 SLE subjects and 7 physicians. After refinement, 569 English-speaking SLE subjects and 14 rheumatologists from 11 international SLE clinics participated in validation. Subjects and physicians completed the instruments separately. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, Spearman's correlations, and agreement using the SDI as the gold standard. Six hundred five SLE participants in the community-based National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases (NDB) study completed the LDIQ and we assessed correlations with outcome and disability measures. RESULTS: The mean LDIQ score was 3.3 (range 0-16) and the mean SDI score was 1.5 (range 0-9). The LDIQ had a moderately high correlation with the SDI (Spearman's r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Specificities of individual LDIQ items were >80%, except for neuropathy. Sensitivities were variable and lowest for damage, with <1% prevalence. Agreement between the SDI and LDIQ was >85% for all but neuropathy, reduced renal function, deforming arthritis, and alopecia. In the NDB, the LDIQ correlated well with the comorbidity index (r = 0.45), the Short Form 36 physical component scale (r = 0.43), the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (r = 0.40), disability (r = 0.37), and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Questionnaire score (r = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The metric properties of the LDIQ are good compared with the SDI. It has construct validity and correlations with health assessments similar to the SDI. The LDIQ should allow expansion of SLE research. Its ultimate value will be determined in longitudinal studies.
OBJECTIVE: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) is a validated instrument for assessing organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Trained physicians must complete it, thus limiting utility where this is impossible. METHODS: We developed and pilot tested a self-assessed organ damage instrument, the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ), in 37 SLE subjects and 7 physicians. After refinement, 569 English-speaking SLE subjects and 14 rheumatologists from 11 international SLE clinics participated in validation. Subjects and physicians completed the instruments separately. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, Spearman's correlations, and agreement using the SDI as the gold standard. Six hundred five SLEparticipants in the community-based National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases (NDB) study completed the LDIQ and we assessed correlations with outcome and disability measures. RESULTS: The mean LDIQ score was 3.3 (range 0-16) and the mean SDI score was 1.5 (range 0-9). The LDIQ had a moderately high correlation with the SDI (Spearman's r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Specificities of individual LDIQ items were >80%, except for neuropathy. Sensitivities were variable and lowest for damage, with <1% prevalence. Agreement between the SDI and LDIQ was >85% for all but neuropathy, reduced renal function, deforming arthritis, and alopecia. In the NDB, the LDIQ correlated well with the comorbidity index (r = 0.45), the Short Form 36 physical component scale (r = 0.43), the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (r = 0.40), disability (r = 0.37), and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Questionnaire score (r = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The metric properties of the LDIQ are good compared with the SDI. It has construct validity and correlations with health assessments similar to the SDI. The LDIQ should allow expansion of SLE research. Its ultimate value will be determined in longitudinal studies.
Authors: E M Tan; A S Cohen; J F Fries; A T Masi; D J McShane; N F Rothfield; J G Schaller; N Talal; R J Winchester Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1982-11
Authors: E W Karlson; L H Daltroy; C Rivest; R Ramsey-Goldman; E A Wright; A J Partridge; M H Liang; P R Fortin Journal: Lupus Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: E M Ginzler; H S Diamond; M Weiner; M Schlesinger; J F Fries; C Wasner; T A Medsger; G Ziegler; J H Klippel; N M Hadler; D A Albert; E V Hess; G Spencer-Green; A Grayzel; D Worth; B H Hahn; E V Barnett Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1982-06
Authors: Ricard Cervera; Munther A Khamashta; Josep Font; Gian Domenico Sebastiani; Antonio Gil; Paz Lavilla; Juan Carlos Mejía; A Olcay Aydintug; Hanna Chwalinska-Sadowska; Enrique de Ramón; Antonio Fernández-Nebro; Mauro Galeazzi; Merete Valen; Alessandro Mathieu; Frédéric Houssiau; Natividad Caro; Paula Alba; Manuel Ramos-Casals; Miguel Ingelmo; Graham R V Hughes Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: L M Vilá; G S Alarcón; G McGwin; A W Friedman; B A Baethge; H M Bastian; B J Fessler; J D Reveille Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Stuart A Gansky; Maria Dall'era; Edward H Yelin; Lindsey A Criswell; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: David H Chae; Connor D Martz; Thomas E Fuller-Rowell; Erica C Spears; Tianqi Tenchi Gao Smith; Evelyn A Hunter; Cristina Drenkard; S Sam Lim Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: C Drenkard; J Yazdany; L Trupin; P P Katz; C Dunlop-Thomas; G Bao; S S Lim Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Emily C Somers; Jiha Lee; Afton L Hassett; Suzanna M Zick; Siobán D Harlow; Charles G Helmick; Kamil E Barbour; Caroline Gordon; Chad M Brummett; Deeba Minhas; Amrita Padda; Lu Wang; W Joseph McCune; Wendy Marder Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 17.586