OBJECTIVE: In recent years hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has emerged as a key therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We determined the rates of HCQ use in a diverse, community-based cohort of patients with SLE and identified predictors of current HCQ use. METHODS: Patients were participants in the University of California San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study, an ongoing longitudinal study of patients with confirmed SLE. We examined the prevalence of HCQ use per person-year and compared baseline characteristics of users and nonusers, including demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and health system use variables. Multiple logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate predictors of HCQ use. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients contributed 3,095 person-years of data over 4 interview cycles. The prevalence of HCQ use was 55 per 100 person-years and was constant throughout the observation period. In multivariate models, the odds of HCQ use were nearly doubled among patients receiving their SLE care from a rheumatologist compared with those identifying generalists or nephrologists as their primary sources of SLE care. In addition, patients with shorter disease duration were more likely to use HCQ, even after adjusting for age and other covariates. CONCLUSION: In this community-based cohort of patients, HCQ use was suboptimal. Physician specialty and disease duration were the strongest predictors of HCQ use. Patients who are not using HCQ, those with longer disease duration, and those who see nonrheumatologists for their SLE care should be targeted for quality improvement.
OBJECTIVE: In recent years hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has emerged as a key therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We determined the rates of HCQ use in a diverse, community-based cohort of patients with SLE and identified predictors of current HCQ use. METHODS:Patients were participants in the University of California San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study, an ongoing longitudinal study of patients with confirmed SLE. We examined the prevalence of HCQ use per person-year and compared baseline characteristics of users and nonusers, including demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and health system use variables. Multiple logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate predictors of HCQ use. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients contributed 3,095 person-years of data over 4 interview cycles. The prevalence of HCQ use was 55 per 100 person-years and was constant throughout the observation period. In multivariate models, the odds of HCQ use were nearly doubled among patients receiving their SLE care from a rheumatologist compared with those identifying generalists or nephrologists as their primary sources of SLE care. In addition, patients with shorter disease duration were more likely to use HCQ, even after adjusting for age and other covariates. CONCLUSION: In this community-based cohort of patients, HCQ use was suboptimal. Physician specialty and disease duration were the strongest predictors of HCQ use. Patients who are not using HCQ, those with longer disease duration, and those who see nonrheumatologists for their SLE care should be targeted for quality improvement.
Authors: Diana M Tisnado; John L Adams; Honghu Liu; Cheryl L Damberg; Wen-Pin Chen; Fang Ashlee Hu; David M Carlisle; Carol M Mangione; Katherine L Kahn Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Barri J Fessler; Graciela S Alarcón; Gerald McGwin; Jeffrey Roseman; Holly M Bastian; Alan W Friedman; Bruce A Baethge; Luis Vilá; John D Reveille Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-05
Authors: E Tsakonas; L Joseph; J M Esdaile; D Choquette; J L Senécal; A Cividino; D Danoff; C K Osterland; C Yeadon; C D Smith Journal: Lupus Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: G Ruiz-Irastorza; M V Egurbide; J I Pijoan; M Garmendia; I Villar; A Martinez-Berriotxoa; J G Erdozain; C Aguirre Journal: Lupus Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Maria Ansari; Michael G Shlipak; Paul A Heidenreich; Denise Van Ostaeyen; Elizabeth C Pohl; Warren S Browner; Barry M Massie Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mary Chester M Wasko; Helen B Hubert; Vijaya Bharathi Lingala; Jennifer R Elliott; Michael E Luggen; James F Fries; Michael M Ward Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jinoos Yazdany; Candace H Feldman; Jun Liu; Michael M Ward; Michael A Fischer; Karen H Costenbader Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Daniel J Wallace; Vineet S Gudsoorkar; Michael H Weisman; Swamy R Venuturupalli Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Candace H Feldman; LeRoi S Hicks; Tabatha L Norton; Elmer Freeman; Daniel H Solomon Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.517