Literature DB >> 20391378

Potential airborne microbial hazards for workers on dairy and beef cattle farms in Egypt.

Amr M M Abd-Elall1, Mohamed E M Mohamed, Maysa A I Awadallah.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the concentration and frequency distribution of certain airborne micro-organisms on cattle farms and their potential health hazards to farm workers. The samples (60 air samples and 240 hand and nasal swabs from cattle farm workers) were collected from ten cattle farms (five dairy barns and five beef sheds) located in the Sharkia Governorate of Egypt. Air samples were collected for microbiological examination in liquid media using an all-glass impinger whereas those for fungal examination were placed on agar plates using slit air samplers (aeroscopes). The results showed that the overall means of total culturable bacterial and fungal counts were lower in the air of dairy cattle barns than in beef cattle sheds. Identification of the isolated bacteria revealed the recovery of the following species (from dairy cattle barns versus beef cattle sheds): Staphylococcus epidermidis (26.7% vs 36.7%), S. saprophyticus (20% vs 33.3%), S. aureus (10% vs 16.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (23.3% vs 26.7%), Enterobacter agglomerans (23.3 vs 13.3%), Escherichia coli, (16.7% vs 26.7%), Klebsiella oxytoca, (10% vs 16.7%), K. pneumoniae (3.3% vs 0%), Proteus rettegri (6.7% vs 13.3%), P. mirabilis (10% vs 10%), P. vulgaris (3.3% vs 6.7%), Pseudomonas species (6.7% vs 16.7%), respectively). Mycological examination of air samples revealed the presence of Aspergillus fumigatus (46.7% vs 63.3%), A. niger (20% vs 36.7%), A. flavus (13.3% vs 26.7%), Penicillium citrinum (16.7% vs 23.3%), P. viridicatum (13.3% vs 6.7%), P. capsulatum (3.3% vs 0%), Cladosporium spp. (30% vs 56.7%), Alternaria spp. (13.3 vs 23.3%), Mucor spp. (6.7% vs 16.7%), Fusarium spp. (3.3% vs 10%), Absidia spp. (6.7% vs 10%), Curvilaria spp. (10% vs 3.3%), Rhizopus spp. (6.7% vs 13.3%), Scopulariopsis (3.3% vs 6.7%), Epicoccum spp. (0% vs 3.4%) and yeast (13.3% vs 20%), respectively. In addition, microbiological examinations of farm workers revealed heavy contamination of their hands and noses with most of the micro-organisms detected in the air of cattle farms. The results showed that potential airborne microbial risks in beef cattle sheds were greater than in dairies.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20391378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Ital        ISSN: 0505-401X            Impact factor:   1.101


  6 in total

1.  Understanding transmission pathways and integrated digital surveillance potential of antimicrobial resistance in Ethiopia in a One Health approach: a mixed-method study protocol.

Authors:  Muhammad Asaduzzaman; Ernst Kristian Rodland; Zeleke Mekonnen; Christoph Gradmann; Andrea Sylvia Winkler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Microbial groundwater sampling protocol for fecal-rich environments.

Authors:  Thomas Harter; Naoko Watanabe; Xunde Li; Edward R Atwill; William Samuels
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Staphylococcus saprophyticus Recovered from Humans, Food, and Recreational Waters in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Viviane Santos de Sousa; Ana Paula de Souza da-Silva; Leif Sorenson; Raphael Paiva Paschoal; Renata Fernandes Rabello; Eloiza Helena Campana; Márcia Soares Pinheiro; Lyssa Oliveira Ferreira Dos Santos; Natacha Martins; Ana Carolina Nunes Botelho; Renata Cristina Picão; Sérgio Eduardo Longo Fracalanzza; Lee Woodland Riley; George Sensabaugh; Beatriz Meurer Moreira
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24

4.  Fungi Isolated From House Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on Penned Cattle in South Texas.

Authors:  Cherity A Ysquierdo; Pia U Olafson; Donald B Thomas
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Non-culturable bioaerosols in indoor settings: Impact on health and molecular approaches for detection.

Authors:  Pascale Blais-Lecours; Phillipa Perrott; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Evaluation of the efficacy of commonly used disinfectants against isolated chlorine-resistant strains from drinking water used in Egyptian cattle farms.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelhameed Kamal; Mahmoud Abdelaty Khalaf; Zakia Attia Mohamed Ahmed; Jakeen El Jakee
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-12-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.