Literature DB >> 2039128

Acute appendicitis. A 5-year review.

M A Ricci1, M F Trevisani, W C Beck.   

Abstract

A startling 31 per cent rate of perforated appendicitis in 1984 prompted a 5-year review at the Guthrie Medical Center. An increase over previous rates of 13 per cent and 0 per cent in 1964 and 1944 was confirmed in this study. Perforation accompanied 44 of 240 cases of appendicitis (18.3%); diagnostic accuracy in 295 cases undergoing operation was 81.4 per cent. Groups at risk for perforation were patients in the first decade of life (34.3% with perforations) and those over 50 years of age (48% perforated). Perforation rates were generally inversely related to accuracy. Accuracy was poorest in women in the second to fourth decade or those in the mid-portion of the menstrual cycle. When the appendix was not perforated, complications occurred in 8.7 per cent of patients while 29.5 per cent with a perforation had a complication. The mean hospital stay was prolonged by 2.5 days if the appendix was perforated. An increased awareness of the risk by both the public and physicians is essential to reduce the number of perforations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  13 in total

1.  Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

Authors:  D Oliak; D Yamini; V M Udani; R J Lewis; H Vargas; T Arnell; M J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Alvarado score and acute appendicitis.

Authors:  O A Adedeji
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases.

Authors:  Slim Charfi; Ahmad Sellami; Abdellatif Affes; Khalil Yaïch; Rafik Mzali; Tahya Sellami Boudawara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Appendectomies in rural hospitals. Safe whether performed by specialist or GP surgeons.

Authors:  S Iglesias; L D Saunders; N Tracy; N Thangisalam; L Jones
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Geraint T Williams; Brian I Rees
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Julie A Margenthaler; Walter E Longo; Katherine S Virgo; Frank E Johnson; Charles A Oprian; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  I Chamisa
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Level of aggregation for optimal epidemiological analysis: the case of time to surgery and unnecessary removal of the normal appendix.

Authors:  S W Wen; K Demissie; D August; G G Rhoads
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Prevalence of Postoperative Unfavorable Outcome and Associated Factors in Patients with Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Wolde Melese Ayele
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-06

10.  Clinicopathological review of 156 appendicectomies for acute appendicitis in children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Talabi O Ademola; Sowande A Oludayo; Olowookere A Samuel; Etonyeaku C Amarachukwu; Komolafe O Akinwunmi; Adejuyigbe Olusanya
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.