Literature DB >> 2039068

The diagnosis of knee motion limits, subluxations, and ligament injury.

F R Noyes1, J F Cummings, E S Grood, K A Walz-Hasselfeld, R R Wroble.   

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of knee ligament injuries requires the clinician to: 1) estimate the abnormal motion limits that occur in one or more of the six degrees of freedom that comprise three-dimensional motion; 2) determine the abnormal position (subluxation) of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments; and 3) precisely define the anatomical structures injured and degree of that injury. To determine the clinician's ability to perform these tasks, we evaluated 11 knee surgeons' clinical examination for knee instability. The positions and motions included were measured in right-left cadaveric knees by a three-dimensional instrumented spacial linkage. We compared the clinicians' estimate of knee motion limits and subluxations with the actual measured values. Before and after the clinicians' examination, the three-dimensional limits of knee motion were measured in the knees in the laboratory under defined loading conditions. Also, in one knee, the ACL and superficial medial collateral ligament were cut and the examiners, none of whom were informed of the sectioning, were asked to arrive at a diagnosis. The results for all of the clinical instability tests were similar. There was wide variability between examiners in the starting position of knee flexion and tibial rotation and in the amount of tibial translation and rotation induced. Although some examiners displaced the knee to the maximal displacement limits obtained in the laboratory, others did not, by a substantial margin. This suggests a wide variation in the loads applied by examiners to the knee joint during the tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039068     DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Does the Lachman testing method affect the reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form?

Authors:  David S Johnson; William G Ryan; Roger B Smith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Complex function of the knee joint: the current understanding of the knee.

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Werner Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Description of the posterolateral rotatory drawer maneuver for the identification of posterolateral corner injury.

Authors:  Fábio Janson Angelini; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Camilo Partezani Helito; Roberto Freire da Mota E Albuquerque; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-04-28

4.  Influence of individual characteristics on static rotational knee laxity using the Rotameter.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Romain Seil; Hélène Agostinis; Stefan Maas; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis and Varus-Valgus Laxity.

Authors:  Gregory M Freisinger; Laura C Schmitt; Andrea B Wanamaker; Robert A Siston; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Robotic axial lower leg testing: repeatability and reproducibility.

Authors:  Thomas Branch; Shaun Stinton; Maya Sternberg; William Hutton; Frédéric Lavoie; Christian Guier; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Assessment of knee laxity using a robotic testing device: a comparison to the manual clinical knee examination.

Authors:  T P Branch; S K Stinton; R Siebold; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs; W C Hutton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.