Literature DB >> 20389250

Pro variant of TP53 Arg72Pro contributes to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Bin Wang1, Dan Wang, Deqiang Zhang, Aijun Li, Dawei Liu, Hu Liu, Hai Jin.   

Abstract

The TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism has been investigated as a potential genetic hallmark of esophageal cancer, but studies investigating the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk have reported conflicting results. A meta-analysis was conducted to reach a conclusion on such a possible association. Computer searches of the literature were conducted in Pubmed and Embase databases and 11 published case-control studies were finally included, involving a total of 2294 esophageal cancer cases and 4034 controls. When all 11 studies were pooled into the analysis, an increased esophageal cancer risk was significantly associated with the Pro variant of TP53 Arg72Pro in three genetic comparison models [odds ratio (OR)Pro vs. Arg=1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.39, POR=0.009; ORDominant genetic model=1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.37, POR=0.001; ORHomozygote model=1.40, 95% CI: 1.05-1.87, POR=0.024]. In subgroup analyses based on pathological type, the Pro variant was significantly associated with an increased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk in all four genetic comparison models (ORPro vs. Arg=1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47, POR=0.003; OR Recessive genetic model=1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.88, POR=0.015; ORDominant genetic model=1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.42, POR=0.001; ORHomozygote model=1.55, 95% CI: 1.14-2.10, POR=0.005), whereas the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk was still uncertain owing to the limited studies included in this meta-analysis. In addition, the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and ESCC risk was also significant in Asians. These results suggest that the Pro variant of TP53 Arg72Pro is an important genetic hallmark contributing to ESCC risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20389250     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833964bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  5 in total

1.  Role of the functional variant (-652T>G) in the XRCC4 promoter in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ning Shao; JiuMing Li; Bin Xu; Yang Wang; XiaoJie Lu; NingHan Feng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Modeling gene-environment interactions in oral cavity and esophageal cancers demonstrates a role for the p53 R72P polymorphism in modulating susceptibility.

Authors:  Jayanta Sarkar; Emily Dominguez; Guojun Li; Donna F Kusewitt; David G Johnson
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  Association between p53 Pro72Arg polymorphism and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Zhang; Ning Shao; Qianqian Yu; Lixin Hua; Yuanyuan Mi; Ninghan Feng
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-01

4.  Meta-analysis of association between rs1447295 polymorphism and prostate cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Yang Yu; Anyou Zhu; Fengchao Wang; Shuxia Kang; Yunfeng Pei; Chunping Cao; Chen Ding; Duping Wang; Li Sun; Guoping Niu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-05

5.  Comparative study and meta-analysis of meta-analysis studies for the correlation of genomic markers with early cancer detection.

Authors:  Zoi Lanara; Efstathia Giannopoulou; Marta Fullen; Evangelos Kostantinopoulos; Jean-Christophe Nebel; Haralabos P Kalofonos; George P Patrinos; Cristiana Pavlidis
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.