BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effects of three different training advices, after 1 year, following a 6 months supervised cardiac rehabilitation period in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS:Sixty-nine CHF patients were randomized, at the end of their rehabilitation period, either to usual care (UC) or to UC and controlled home training (HT), prolonged supervised training (ST) or preferred training (PT). Treadmill cardio-pulmonary exercise testing was performed before rehabilitation, postrehabilitation and thereafter at 3-month intervals during the 1-year follow-up. submaximal exercise capacity [Oxygen consumption and workload at the respiratory compensation point (VO2RCP, WattRCP) and submaximal workload (SMW) efficiency (SMW/HR) at 70% of the initial maximal workload] was chosen as a primary endpoint, because health status in CHF patients depends largely on their ability to perform activities at a submaximal level. RESULTS: After 6 months of rehabilitation, the four groups (UC, HT, ST and PT) were comparable with regard to cardiac rehabilitation-derived benefit, both at the submaximal and maximal level. Although exercise capacity during follow-up declined in both UC and HT patients, ST and especially PT patients maintained and even improved VO2peak and VO2RCP. However, only PT patients managed to maintain or even increase submaximal (WattRCP and SMW/HR ratio) workload (P=0.045 and <0.0001 for interaction, respectively). Ventilatory-derived prognostic markers during treadmill cardio pulmonary exercise testing evolved similarly in the four subgroups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that engagement in physical training of their own choice (PT), might be the optimal training modality for maintaining physical capacity in CHF patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effects of three different training advices, after 1 year, following a 6 months supervised cardiac rehabilitation period in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Sixty-nine CHFpatients were randomized, at the end of their rehabilitation period, either to usual care (UC) or to UC and controlled home training (HT), prolonged supervised training (ST) or preferred training (PT). Treadmill cardio-pulmonary exercise testing was performed before rehabilitation, postrehabilitation and thereafter at 3-month intervals during the 1-year follow-up. submaximal exercise capacity [Oxygen consumption and workload at the respiratory compensation point (VO2RCP, WattRCP) and submaximal workload (SMW) efficiency (SMW/HR) at 70% of the initial maximal workload] was chosen as a primary endpoint, because health status in CHFpatients depends largely on their ability to perform activities at a submaximal level. RESULTS: After 6 months of rehabilitation, the four groups (UC, HT, ST and PT) were comparable with regard to cardiac rehabilitation-derived benefit, both at the submaximal and maximal level. Although exercise capacity during follow-up declined in both UC and HT patients, ST and especially PT patients maintained and even improved VO2peak and VO2RCP. However, only PT patients managed to maintain or even increase submaximal (WattRCP and SMW/HR ratio) workload (P=0.045 and <0.0001 for interaction, respectively). Ventilatory-derived prognostic markers during treadmill cardio pulmonary exercise testing evolved similarly in the four subgroups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that engagement in physical training of their own choice (PT), might be the optimal training modality for maintaining physical capacity in CHFpatients.
Authors: Gerson Cipriano; Vivian T F Cipriano; Vinicius Z Maldaner da Silva; Graziella F B Cipriano; Gaspar R Chiappa; Alexandra C G B de Lima; Lawrence P Cahalin; Ross Arena Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Ronald Cohen; Lawrence H Sweet; Richard Josephson; Joel Hughes; Jim Rosneck; John Gunstad Journal: Acta Cardiol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 1.718