Literature DB >> 20389209

A population-based study on outcome in relation to the type of resection in low rectal cancer.

Claes Anderin1, Anna Martling, Henrick Hellborg, Torbjörn Holm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: : The aim of this population-based study was to assess treatment and outcome in patients resected for low rectal cancer, focusing on differences relating to the type of resection.
METHODS: All patients in Stockholm with a rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge, diagnosed from January 1995 to December 2003, and treated with abdominoperineal resection, anterior resection, or Hartmann procedure were included (n = 613). Clinical data, histopathology, and outcome were analyzed in relation to the type of surgery performed.
RESULTS: Bowel perforations and incomplete tumor clearance were more common in the abdominoperineal group (12%) than in the anterior (4%) and Hartmann procedure groups (9%; P = .03). Incomplete tumor clearance was also more common in the abdominoperineal group (18%) than in the anterior (5%) or Hartmann groups (14%; P < .01). In multivariate analysis, local pelvic control was significantly associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and complete tumor resection, and survival was significantly associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, lower tumor stage, female gender, younger age, and complete tumor resection. Although local control and survival were poorer after abdominoperineal than after anterior resection, the type of operation was not an independent prognostic factor.
CONCLUSION: Inadvertent bowel perforations and tumor-involved margins are more common after abdominoperineal than after anterior resection in low rectal cancer. Although previous studies have shown that abdominoperineal resection is also associated with poorer oncological outcomes, the present study could not confirm that the type of procedure per se is a significant determinant of prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20389209     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181cf7e27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Wound dehiscence after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer is associated with decreased survival.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; David L Berger; Paul C Shellito; Patrica Sylla; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Outcomes after biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER).

Authors:  O Peacock; J A Simpson; S I Tou; N G Hurst; W J Speake; G M Tierney; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Quality of surgical care, local recurrence, and survival in patients with low- and midrectal cancers following multimodal therapy.

Authors:  Ilmo Kellokumpu; Jaana Vironen; Matti Kairaluoma; Ismo Jantunen; Hannu Kautiainen; Kyösti Nuorva
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Carsta Koehler; Juliane Stelzer; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Short-term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Clemens Schubert; Erik Puffer; Gunter Haroske; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors for adverse outcome in low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Hui Chen; Xin-Ming Song; Shi-Cai Chen; Ming-Zhe Li; Xin-Xin Li; Wen-Hua Zhan; Yu-Long He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Selective extra levator versus conventional abdomino perineal resection: experience from a tertiary-care center.

Authors:  Vishwas D Pai; Reena Engineer; Prachi S Patil; Supreeta Arya; Ashwin L Desouza; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

8.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.

Authors:  Mattias Prytz; Eva Angenete; Jan Ekelund; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Sabrina M Ebinger; Walter Brunner; Bruno M Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  The importance of rectal washout for the oncological outcome after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: analysis of population-based data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.

Authors:  F Jörgren; R Johansson; H Arnadottir; G Lindmark
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.