Literature DB >> 20389096

Clinical efficacy of highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis.

Byung Chul Jee1, Chang Suk Suh, Yong Beom Kim, Seok Hyun Kim, Shin Yong Moon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of highly purified hMG (Menopur) with recombinant FSH (Gonal-F) in IVF/ICSI patients who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with pituitary suppression.
METHODS: A literature search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Medline and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed using the key words 'highly purified hMG' and 'recombinant FSH.' Only prospective randomized controlled trials were included when they compared IVF/ICSI outcomes after administration of Menopur versus Gonal-F. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy/live birth.
RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96-1.26) or per embryo transfer (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99-1.29), as well as live birth rate per embryo transfer (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33), is similar between the Menopur and the Gonal-F group.
CONCLUSION: The combined data presented in this meta-analysis do not support a clinical superiority of Gonal-F over Menopur. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20389096     DOI: 10.1159/000308458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

1.  Consecutive versus concomitant follicle-stimulating hormone and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin: A milder response but better quality.

Authors:  Hassan Ali Maghraby; Abdel Fattah Mohamed Agameya; Manal Shafik Swelam; Nermeen Ahmed El Dabah; Ola Youssef Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  Economic evaluation of alternative assisted reproduction techniques in management of infertility in Greece.

Authors:  Vassilis Fragoulakis; Georgia Kourlaba; Basil Tarlatzis; Minas Mastrominas; Nikolaos Maniadakis
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-07-12

Review 3.  Gonadotropin therapy in assisted reproduction: an evolutionary perspective from biologics to biotech.

Authors:  Rogério de Barros F Leão; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Ming-Jer Chen; Yu-Chiao Yi; Hwa-Fen Guu; Ya-Fang Chen; Hsiao-Fan Kung; Jui-Chun Chang; Shih-Ting Chuan; Li-Yu Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.

Authors:  P E Levi Setti; C Alviggi; G L Colombo; C Pisanelli; C Ripellino; S Longobardi; P L Canonico; G De Placido
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.

Authors:  Jaro Wex; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.