Literature DB >> 20389040

Opinions of children about participation in medical genetic research.

S van der Pal1, B Sozanska, D Madden, A Kosmeda, A Debinska, H Danielewicz, A Boznanski, S Detmar.   

Abstract

AIMS: The objective was to evaluate children's opinions about their participation in a large research project.
METHODS: Polish children between 6 and 14 years of age completed a questionnaire about their participation in the Polish Gabriel study (which aims to identify genetic and environmental causes of asthma). In total 706 questionnaires were collected.
RESULTS: Children's main motivation for participation was wanting to know whether they were healthy or not. Most children could think of no reasons to reconsider participation. Children aged 6-10 years might reconsider participating because they did not know what was going to happen. A third of the children were not informed by anybody about the study. Especially the youngest children indicated a need for a tailored letter (42%). The youngest children were less often asked for their opinion about participation. All children preferred that both parents and children are asked for consent or assent. Children who were not informed or not asked for their opinion seemed less emotionally involved in the study.
CONCLUSION: While researchers and parents tend to focus their information provision to older children and include them in decision-making, especially the younger children expressed a need for more tailored information and involvement in their participation in research.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20389040     DOI: 10.1159/000294173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  8 in total

1.  Is a requirement of personalised assent realistic? A case from the GABRIEL project.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Reply to Waligora.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Carla E Van El; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Martina C Cornel; Francesca Forzano; Anneke Lucassen; Christine Patch; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Eric Vermeulen; Elena Salvaterra; Aad Tibben; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks.

Authors:  Noor Aa Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes Jm van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Child's assent in research: age threshold or personalisation?

Authors:  Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika; Jan Piasecki
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Karen Melham; Jane Kaye; Johannes J M van Delden; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils.

Authors:  Jana Reetz; Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Christine Glinicke; Stephanie Darabaneanu; Alena Buyx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Perspectives of adolescents on decision making about participation in a biobank study: a pilot study.

Authors:  Petronella Grootens-Wiegers; Eline G Visser; Annemarie M C van Rossum; Claudia N van Waardhuizen; Saskia N de Wildt; Boudewijn Sweep; Jos M van den Broek; Martine C de Vries
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-08-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.