Literature DB >> 20387968

Mechanical stimulation mediates gene expression in MC3T3 osteoblastic cells differently in 2D and 3D environments.

Matthew J Barron1, Chung-Jui Tsai, Seth W Donahue.   

Abstract

Successful bone tissue engineering requires the understanding of cellular activity in three-dimensional (3D) architectures and how it compares to two-dimensional (2D) architecture. We developed a perfusion culture system that utilizes fluid flow to mechanically load a cell-seeded 3D scaffold. This study compared the gene expression of osteoblastic cells in 2D and 3D cultures, and the effects of mechanical loading on gene expression in 2D and 3D cultures. MC3T3-E1 osteoblastlike cells were seeded onto 2D glass slides and 3D calcium phosphate scaffolds and cultured statically or mechanically loaded with fluid flow. Gene expression of OPN and FGF-2 was upregulated at 24 h and 48 h in 3D compared with 2D static cultures, while collagen 1 gene expression was downregulated. In addition, while flow increased OPN in 2D culture at 48 h, it decreased both OPN and FGF-2 in 3D culture. In conclusion, gene expression is different between 2D and 3D osteoblast cultures under static conditions. Additionally, osteoblasts respond to shear stress differently in 2D and 3D cultures. Our results highlight the importance of 3D mechanotransduction studies for bone tissue engineering applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20387968     DOI: 10.1115/1.4001162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical stretching for tissue engineering: two-dimensional and three-dimensional constructs.

Authors:  Brandon D Riehl; Jae-Hong Park; Il Keun Kwon; Jung Yul Lim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Role of NF-κB in the skeleton.

Authors:  Deborah Veis Novack
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Preclinical models for in vitro mechanical loading of bone-derived cells.

Authors:  Robin Michael Delaine-Smith; Behzad Javaheri; Jennifer Helen Edwards; Marisol Vazquez; Robin Mark Howard Rumney
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-08-19

4.  Effect of pulse frequency on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a pulsatile perfusion bioreactor.

Authors:  Katherine D Kavlock; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Mechanical regulation of vascular growth and tissue regeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Brent A Uhrig; Nick J Willett; Nathaniel Huebsch; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Biomechanical forces in the skeleton and their relevance to bone metastasis: biology and engineering considerations.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Constitutive nuclear expression of dentin matrix protein 1 fails to rescue the Dmp1-null phenotype.

Authors:  Shuxian Lin; Qi Zhang; Zhengguo Cao; Yongbo Lu; Hua Zhang; Kevin Yan; Ying Liu; Marc D McKee; Chunlin Qin; Zhi Chen; Jian Q Feng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Impact of flow shear stress on morphology of osteoblast-like IDG-SW3 cells.

Authors:  Huiyun Xu; Jing Duan; Li Ren; Pengfei Yang; Ruixin Yang; Wenbin Li; Dongdong Zhao; Peng Shang; Jean X Jiang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Macro and microfluidic flows for skeletal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Brandon D Riehl; Jung Yul Lim
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  A new method to investigate how mechanical loading of osteocytes controls osteoblasts.

Authors:  Marisol Vazquez; Bronwen A J Evans; Daniela Riccardi; Sam L Evans; Jim R Ralphs; Christopher Mark Dillingham; Deborah J Mason
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.