Literature DB >> 20387911

Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.

Mohamed A Hussein1, Richard H Chapman, Joshua S Benner, Simon S K Tang, Henry A Solomon, Amie Joyce, Joanne M Foody.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous study in 4703 patients suggested that a single-pill combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin is associated with greater adherence to therapy than a two-pill calcium channel antagonist (calcium channel blocker [CCB]) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) regimen. However, the impact of prior medication use on the potential adherence benefits of single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence to single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill CCB + statin regimens in a large managed care population, stratified according to prior CCB and statin use.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted among managed care enrolees in the US. Patients included in the analysis had to have a pharmacy claim for single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin or claims for both a CCB and a statin within any 30-day window between April 2004 and April 2005. Adherence was measured over 6 months following the index date (the date of the first single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin claim or of the claim for the second medication class for any two-pill CCB + statin regimen) as the proportion of days covered (PDC) by both CCB and statin therapy; patients were considered 'adherent' if PDC was > or =80%. Patients were divided into four cohorts based on pre-index CCB and statin use: (i) naive (CCB)/naive (statin); (ii) experienced (CCB)/naive (statin); (iii) naive (CCB)/experienced (statin); and (iv) experienced (CCB)/experienced (statin). Within each cohort, adherence was compared for patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (including amlodipine or atorvastatin but not both) at index. Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score weighting was used to adjust for covariates, including age, sex and co-morbidities.
RESULTS: In total, 35,430 patients were included in the analysis. At month 6 (after adjusting for covariates), patients in the experienced (CCB)/naive (statin) cohort receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were more than twice as likely to be adherent as those receiving two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR] 2.20; p < 0.0001) or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 2.75; p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients in the naive (CCB)/experienced (statin) cohort receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were more likely to be adherent than those receiving two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.72; p < 0.0001) or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 2.81; p < 0.0001). In contrast, in the naive (CCB)/naive (statin) cohort there was no significant difference in adherence between patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.00), although patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were slightly more likely to be adherent than those receiving other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 1.29; p < 0.01). In the experienced (CCB)/experienced (statin) cohort there was also no significant difference between patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.08), and only a slightly greater likelihood of achieving adherence to single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 1.19; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study confirms previous observations that single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin can help improve adherence versus two-pill CCB + statin regimens. However, greater improvements in adherence are likely to be observed in patients with prior experience of either CCB or statin therapy than in those either naive to, or experienced with, both therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20387911     DOI: 10.2165/11530680-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  12 in total

1.  Medication adherence: WHO cares?

Authors:  Marie T Brown; Jennifer K Bussell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017.

Authors:  Makoto Kinoshita; Koutaro Yokote; Hidenori Arai; Mami Iida; Yasushi Ishigaki; Shun Ishibashi; Seiji Umemoto; Genshi Egusa; Hirotoshi Ohmura; Tomonori Okamura; Shinji Kihara; Shinji Koba; Isao Saito; Tetsuo Shoji; Hiroyuki Daida; Kazuhisa Tsukamoto; Juno Deguchi; Seitaro Dohi; Kazushige Dobashi; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi; Masumi Hara; Takafumi Hiro; Sadatoshi Biro; Yoshio Fujioka; Chizuko Maruyama; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Masayuki Yokode; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hiromi Rakugi; Akihiko Wakatsuki; Shizuya Yamashita
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.928

3.  Does tablet formulation alone improve adherence and persistence: a comparison of ezetimibe fixed dose combination versus ezetimibe separate pill combination?

Authors:  Louise E Bartlett; Nicole Pratt; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Combining antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic agents - optimizing cardiovascular risk factor management.

Authors:  José Zamorano; Jonathan Edwards
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2011-11-15

Review 5.  Patient considerations in type 2 diabetes - role of combination dapagliflozin-metformin XR.

Authors:  Catherine M Kuecker; Eva M Vivian
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Post Hoc Analysis of the CONFIDENCE II, PROTECT I, SHAKE THE HABIT I and SHAKE THE HABIT II Observational Studies in Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients Treated with Perindopril and Atorvastatin Concomitantly.

Authors:  John S Sampalis; Eliofotisti Psaradellis; Melissa Stutz; Jenaya Rickard; Emmanouil Rampakakis
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2018-12

7.  Fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin improves clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Chia-Pin Lin; Ying-Chang Tung; Fu-Chih Hsiao; Chia-Hung Yang; Yi-Wei Kao; Yu-Sheng Lin; You-Chia Chu; Pao-Hsien Chu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Reduction in cardiovascular risk using a proactive multifactorial intervention is consistent among patients residing in Pacific Asian and non-Pacific Asian regions: a CRUCIAL trial subanalysis.

Authors:  Eun Joo Cho; Jae Hyung Kim; Santosh Sutradhar; Carla Yunis; Mogens Westergaard
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-03-26

Review 9.  Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Sheraz; Syed Furqan Ahsan; Marium Fatima Khan; Sofia Ahmed; Iqbal Ahmad
Journal:  J Pharm (Cairo)       Date:  2016-10-16

Review 10.  Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Burkhard Weisser; Hans-Georg Predel; Anton Gillessen; Claudia Hacke; Johannes Vor dem Esche; Gerd Rippin; Andrea Noetel; Olaf Randerath
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2020-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.