BACKGROUND: Chagas Disease is the leading cause of heart failure in Latin America. Current drug therapy is limited by issues of both efficacy and severe side effects. Trypansoma cruzi, the protozoan agent of Chagas Disease, is closely related to two other major global pathogens, Leishmania spp., responsible for leishmaniasis, and Trypansoma brucei, the causative agent of African Sleeping Sickness. Both T. cruzi and Leishmania parasites have an essential requirement for ergosterol, and are thus vulnerable to inhibitors of sterol 14alpha-demethylase (CYP51), which catalyzes the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol. Clinically employed anti-fungal azoles inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis in fungi, and specific azoles are also effective against both Trypanosoma and Leishmania parasites. However, modification of azoles to enhance efficacy and circumvent potential drug resistance has been problematic for both parasitic and fungal infections due to the lack of structural insights into drug binding. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have determined the crystal structures for CYP51 from T. cruzi (resolutions of 2.35 A and 2.27 A), and from the related pathogen T. brucei (resolutions of 2.7 A and 2.6 A), co-crystallized with the antifungal drugs fluconazole and posaconazole. Remarkably, both drugs adopt multiple conformations when binding the target. The fluconazole 2,4-difluorophenyl ring flips 180 degrees depending on the H-bonding interactions with the BC-loop. The terminus of the long functional tail group of posaconazole is bound loosely in the mouth of the hydrophobic substrate binding tunnel, suggesting that the major contribution of the tail to drug efficacy is for pharmacokinetics rather than in interactions with the target. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The structures provide new insights into binding of azoles to CYP51 and mechanisms of potential drug resistance. Our studies define in structural detail the CYP51 therapeutic target in T. cruzi, and offer a starting point for rationally designed anti-Chagasic drugs with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity.
BACKGROUND:Chagas Disease is the leading cause of heart failure in Latin America. Current drug therapy is limited by issues of both efficacy and severe side effects. Trypansoma cruzi, the protozoan agent of Chagas Disease, is closely related to two other major global pathogens, Leishmania spp., responsible for leishmaniasis, and Trypansoma brucei, the causative agent of African Sleeping Sickness. Both T. cruzi and Leishmania parasites have an essential requirement for ergosterol, and are thus vulnerable to inhibitors of sterol 14alpha-demethylase (CYP51), which catalyzes the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol. Clinically employed anti-fungal azoles inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis in fungi, and specific azoles are also effective against both Trypanosoma and Leishmania parasites. However, modification of azoles to enhance efficacy and circumvent potential drug resistance has been problematic for both parasitic and fungal infections due to the lack of structural insights into drug binding. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have determined the crystal structures for CYP51 from T. cruzi (resolutions of 2.35 A and 2.27 A), and from the related pathogen T. brucei (resolutions of 2.7 A and 2.6 A), co-crystallized with the antifungal drugs fluconazole and posaconazole. Remarkably, both drugs adopt multiple conformations when binding the target. The fluconazole2,4-difluorophenyl ring flips 180 degrees depending on the H-bonding interactions with the BC-loop. The terminus of the long functional tail group of posaconazole is bound loosely in the mouth of the hydrophobic substrate binding tunnel, suggesting that the major contribution of the tail to drug efficacy is for pharmacokinetics rather than in interactions with the target. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The structures provide new insights into binding of azoles to CYP51 and mechanisms of potential drug resistance. Our studies define in structural detail the CYP51 therapeutic target in T. cruzi, and offer a starting point for rationally designed anti-Chagasic drugs with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity.
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: L Joseph Wheat; Patricia Connolly; Melinda Smedema; Michelle Durkin; Edward Brizendine; Paul Mann; Reena Patel; Paul M McNicholas; Mitchell Goldman Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Patrick Marichal; Luc Koymans; Staf Willemsens; Danny Bellens; Peter Verhasselt; Walter Luyten; Marcel Borgers; Frans C S Ramaekers; Frank C Odds; Hugo Vanden Bossche Journal: Microbiology Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: Ana Teresa Pinto e Silva; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Ana Silva-Dias; Cidália Pina-Vaz; Acácio Gonçalves Rodrigues Journal: FEMS Yeast Res Date: 2009-04-06 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Paul A Mann; Raulo M Parmegiani; Shui-Qing Wei; Cara A Mendrick; Xin Li; David Loebenberg; Beth DiDomenico; Roberta S Hare; Scott S Walker; Paul M McNicholas Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Susan J Howard; Dasa Cerar; Michael J Anderson; Ahmed Albarrag; Matthew C Fisher; Alessandro C Pasqualotto; Michel Laverdiere; Maiken C Arendrup; David S Perlin; David W Denning Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Chiung-Kuang Chen; Patricia S Doyle; Liudmila V Yermalitskaya; Zachary B Mackey; Kenny K H Ang; James H McKerrow; Larissa M Podust Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-02-03
Authors: A E Paniz Mondolfi; C Stavropoulos; T Gelanew; E Loucas; A M Perez Alvarez; G Benaim; B Polsky; G Schoenian; E M Sordillo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian C Monk; Thomas M Tomasiak; Mikhail V Keniya; Franziska U Huschmann; Joel D A Tyndall; Joseph D O'Connell; Richard D Cannon; Jeffrey G McDonald; Andrew Rodriguez; Janet S Finer-Moore; Robert M Stroud Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura Friggeri; Luigi Scipione; Roberta Costi; Marcel Kaiser; Francesca Moraca; Claudio Zamperini; Bruno Botta; Roberto Di Santo; Daniela De Vita; Reto Brun; Silvano Tortorella Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Patricia S Doyle; Chiung-Kuang Chen; Jonathan B Johnston; Stephanie D Hopkins; Siegfried S F Leung; Matthew P Jacobson; Juan C Engel; James H McKerrow; Larissa M Podust Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andrew G S Warrilow; Josie E Parker; Claire L Price; Edward P Garvey; William J Hoekstra; Robert J Schotzinger; Nathan P Wiederhold; W David Nes; Diane E Kelly; Steven L Kelly Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 5.191