Literature DB >> 20386288

Dynamic hip screws for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients--encouraging results with a cement augmentation technique.

Po-Cheng Lee1, Pang-Hsin Hsieh, Ying-Chao Chou, Chi-Chuan Wu, Wen-Jer Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the good and reliable results of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) for stable fracture patterns, complications of excessive sliding of the lag screw and inadequate bone anchorage occur frequently in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Although polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement has been widely used as a secondary fixation to facilitate fixation stability, there has been no prospective study on the clinical significance of PMMA cement to prevent these two complications in unstable fracture patterns.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted. The DHS was applied either with or without PMMA cement augmentation in 108 elderly patients. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification was 31-A2 in 91 patients and 31-A3 in 17 patients. The average age of the patients was 81.9 years (range, 75-96 years). The average follow-up period was 13.9 months (range, 12-30 months). PMMA cement was injected precisely into the proximal fragment with an average amount of 13.7 mL (range, 10-19 mL) in 55 patients.
RESULTS: All but six patients (5.6%) had eventual bone union, and the average time to union was 18.1 week (range, 12-36 weeks). Screw sliding, femoral shortening, and varus collapse of the proximal fragment were all significantly reduced in the cemented group at the 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean hip pain score was 1.9 (range, 1-4) in all 102 patients and was significantly lower in the cemented group (p = 0.008). One patient with a deep infection in the cemented group and five patients with lag screw penetration in the noncemented group received a total hip replacement. All 18 patients with malunion were in the noncemented group. Of these 18 patients, 14 patients (77.8%) had excessive sliding of the lag screw. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the noncemented group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: With the meticulous augmentation technique demonstrated in this study, the PMMA cemented DHS proved to have better outcome than a conventional DHS for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Typical complications related to a conventional DHS device for the treatment of such fractures were successfully prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386288     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c995ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  16 in total

1.  Is calcium phosphate augmentation a viable option for osteoporotic hip fractures?

Authors:  S-J Kim; H-S Park; D-W Lee; J-W Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Augmentation of implant fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yanfeng Huang; Chunlin Zhang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Trochanteric fixation nail advanced with helical blade and cement augmentation: early experience with a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-17

5.  Comparison of Intra- and Extramedullary Implants in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Tahir Mutlu Duymus; Suavi Aydogmus; İbrahim Ulusoy; Tolga Kececi; Levent Adiyeke; Bahar Dernek; Serhat Mutlu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-04-10

6.  Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Matt L Graves; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Effect of teriparatide on unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Tien-Yu Yang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Kuo-Ti Peng; Mel S Lee; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Measurement of Tip Apex Distance and Migration of Lag Screws and Novel Blade Screw Used for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Jesse Chieh-Szu Yang; Hsin-Chang Chen; Yu-Shu Lai; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cement augmentation for trochanteric femur fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Ingmar F Rompen; Matthias Knobe; Bjoern-Christian Link; Frank J P Beeres; Ralf Baumgaertner; Nadine Diwersi; Filippo Migliorini; Sven Nebelung; Reto Babst; Bryan J M van de Wall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Outcomes of osteoporotic trochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Vinay Gupta; Navdeep Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.