Literature DB >> 20386272

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services quality indicators do not correlate with risk-adjusted mortality at trauma centers.

Shahid Shafi1, Jennifer Parks, Chul Ahn, Larry M Gentilello, Avery B Nathens, Mark R Hemmila, Michael D Pasquale, J Wayne Meredith, H Gill Cryer, Sandra Goble, Melanie Neil, Chrystal Price, John J Fildes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports hospital compliance with evidence-based processes of care as quality indicators. We hypothesized that compliance with CMS quality indicators would correlate with risk-adjusted mortality rates in trauma patients.
METHODS: A previously validated risk-adjustment algorithm was used to measure observed-to-expected mortality ratios (O/E with 95% confidence interval) for Level I and II trauma centers using the National Trauma Data Bank data. Adult patients (>or=16 years) with at least one severe injury (Abbreviated Injury Score >or=3) were included (127,819 patients). Compliance with CMS quality indicators in four domains was obtained from Hospital Compare website: acute myocardial infarction (8 processes), congestive heart failure (4 processes), pneumonia (7 processes), surgical infections (3 processes). For each domain, a single composite score was calculated for each hospital. The relationship between O/E ratios and CMS quality indicators was explored using nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: There was no relationship between compliance with CMS quality indicators and risk-adjusted outcomes of trauma patients.
CONCLUSIONS: CMS quality indicators do not correlate with risk-adjusted mortality rates in trauma patients. Hence, there is a need to develop new trauma-specific process of care quality indicators to evaluate and improve quality of care in trauma centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386272     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d03a20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Relationship between Leapfrog Safe Practices Survey and outcomes in trauma.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; J Wayne Meredith; Patricia W Stone; Yue Li; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10

2.  Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Jennifer Gross; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Maha Al-Gilani; Michael E Stadler; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Does Objective Quality of Physicians Correlate with Patient Satisfaction Measured by Hospital Compare Metrics in New York State?

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie; Patrick M O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact?

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Taimur Saleem; Jeffrey J Leow; Cassandra V Villegas; Mehreen Kisat; Eric B Schneider; Elliott R Haut; Kent A Stevens; Edward E Cornwell; Ellen J MacKenzie; David T Efron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Pinar Kara; Jan Brink Valentin; Jan Mainz; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of closure of an urban level I trauma centre on adjacent hospitals and local injury mortality: a retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Marie Crandall; Douglas Sharp; Xiong Wei; Avery Nathens; Renee Y Hsia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.