Literature DB >> 20386262

Can psychiatrists and neurologists predict their patients' participation preferences?

Johannes Hamann1, Rosmarie Mendel, Matthias Schebitz, Sarah Reiter, Markus Bühner, Rudolf Cohen, Achim Berthele, Werner Kissling.   

Abstract

There is evidence that an optimal match of patients' participation preferences improves health outcomes. Since it is unknown whether psychiatrists and neurologists can predict their patients' participation preferences we performed a cross-sectional survey involving N = 101 inpatients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and N = 102 inpatients with multiple sclerosis. Both patients and their physicians in charge were surveyed with respect to the patients' participation preferences, using the Autonomy Preference Index and a global estimate. Most patients wished to participate in medical decision making. Doctors performed poorly when predicting their individual patients' participation preferences and tended to overestimate their patients' participation preferences. A longer duration of the hospital stay did not improve the accuracy of doctors' estimates. Thus, neurologists and psychiatrists fail at predicting their patients' participation preferences accurately, which might challenge patients' treatment satisfaction. More attention in the consultation should be paid to patients' preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386262     DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d6128c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  6 in total

1.  Compulsory admissions and preferences in decision-making in patients with psychotic and bipolar disorders.

Authors:  Inés Morán-Sánchez; María A Bernal-López; Maria D Pérez-Cárceles
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Activating older adults with serious mental illness for collaborative primary care visits.

Authors:  Stephen J Bartels; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Stephanie A Rolin; Delia Cimpean Hendrick; John A Naslund; Marjan J Faber
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2013-11-11

3.  Factors influencing patients' preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care.

Authors:  Johanne Eliacin; Michelle P Salyers; Marina Kukla; Marianne S Matthias
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2014-10-03

4.  Predicting the preferences for involvement in medical decision making among patients with mental disorders.

Authors:  Svea Michaelis; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter; Birgit Watzke; Holger Schulz; Hanne Melchior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A realist review of advance care planning for people with multiple sclerosis and their families.

Authors:  Laura Cottrell; Guillaume Economos; Catherine Evans; Eli Silber; Rachel Burman; Richard Nicholas; Bobbie Farsides; Stephen Ashford; Jonathan Simon Koffman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS).

Authors:  Bernd Puschner; Petra Neumann; Harriet Jordan; Mike Slade; Andrea Fiorillo; Domenico Giacco; Anikó Egerházi; Tibor Ivánka; Malene Krogsgaard Bording; Helle Østermark Sørensen; Arlette Bär; Wolfram Kawohl; Sabine Loos
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.