Literature DB >> 20385460

Collaborative to decrease ambulance diversion: the California Emergency Department Diversion Project.

Edward M Castillo1, Gary M Vilke, Mike Williams, Pam Turner, Juliana Boyle, Theodore C Chan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulance diversion is a national problem that affects more than half of all emergency departments (EDs). Although diversion was meant to be used for short periods of time to offer temporary relief to EDs, it has evolved into a normal routine in many communities to manage the growing problem of ED and hospital crowding. STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a collaborative effort to decrease ambulance diversion.
METHODS: This is a pre/post study investigating ED diversion in four emergency medical services agency regions in California from September 2006 through August 2008. Hospitals developed and implemented a number of best practices revolved around patient flow initiatives, specifically looking to improve input, throughput, and output. Monthly ED diversion data are compared and reported as means and standard deviations (SD).
RESULTS: During the study period, there were a total of 31,735 diversion hours in the collaborative regions, with 17,618 during the pre-consortium period and 14,117 in the post-consortium period (19.9% decrease). The monthly average hours of diversion before the consortium was 1468 (SD = 390.6). This decreased to 1176 (SD = 605.8) after the initiation of the consortium (difference of 292 h; 95% confidence interval 99-484; p = 0.007). There was a decrease in diversion hours for every month-to-month comparison except January and February (increases of 1% and 14.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a decrease in ambulance diversion can be achieved through ongoing collaboration and the implementation of best practices. Continued communication and emphasis on diversion are likely needed to sustain these decreases.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20385460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review on ambulance offload delay literature.

Authors:  Mengyu Li; Peter Vanberkel; Alix J E Carter
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2018-07-07

2.  Association between ambulance diversion and survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yu-Chu Shen; Renee Y Hsia
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion.

Authors:  Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia; Steven M Asch; Robert E Weiss; David Zingmond; Li-Jung Liang; Weijuan Han; Heather McCreath; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Ambulance diversion and ED destination by race/ethnicity: evaluation of Massachusetts' ambulance diversion ban.

Authors:  Amresh D Hanchate; William E Baker; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; James Feldman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  The use of quality indicators to promote accountability in health care: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2012-06-19

6.  The Impact of Ambulance and Patient Diversion on Crowdedness of Multiple Emergency Departments in a Region.

Authors:  Chung-Yao Kao; Jhen-Ci Yang; Chih-Hao Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Reducing ambulance diversion at hospital and regional levels: systemic review of insights from simulation models.

Authors:  M Kit Delgado; Lesley J Meng; Mary P Mercer; Jesse M Pines; Douglas K Owens; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.