BACKGROUND: To efficiently plan appropriate public health interventions during possible epidemics, governments must take into consideration the following factors about the general population: their knowledge of epidemics, their fears of and psychological responses to them, their level of compliance with government measures and their communities' trusted sources of information. However, such surveys among the French general population are rare. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2006 in a representative sample of 600 subjects living in the Rhône-Alpes region (south-east France) to investigate self-reported knowledge about infectious diseases and anxiety generated by epidemic risk with particular reference to avian influenza. Data on reactions to potentially new epidemics and the confidence level in various sources of information were also collected. RESULTS: Respondents were most knowledgeable about AIDS, followed by avian influenza. Overall, 75% of respondents had adequate knowledge of avian influenza. The percentage was even higher (88%) among inhabitants of the Ain district, where an avian influenza epidemic had previously been reported. However, 39% expressed anxiety about this disease. In total, 20% of respondents with knowledge about avian influenza stated that they had changed their behaviours during the epizooty. Epidemics were perceived as a real threat by 27% of respondents. In the event of a highly contagious outbreak, the majority of respondents said they would follow the advice given by authorities. The study population expressed a high level of confidence in physicians and scientists, but had strong reservations about politicians, deputies and the media. CONCLUSIONS: Although the survey was conducted only four months after the avian influenza outbreak, epidemics were not perceived as a major threat by the study population. The results showed that in the event of a highly infectious disease, the population would comply with advice given by public authorities.
BACKGROUND: To efficiently plan appropriate public health interventions during possible epidemics, governments must take into consideration the following factors about the general population: their knowledge of epidemics, their fears of and psychological responses to them, their level of compliance with government measures and their communities' trusted sources of information. However, such surveys among the French general population are rare. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2006 in a representative sample of 600 subjects living in the Rhône-Alpes region (south-east France) to investigate self-reported knowledge about infectious diseases and anxiety generated by epidemic risk with particular reference to avian influenza. Data on reactions to potentially new epidemics and the confidence level in various sources of information were also collected. RESULTS: Respondents were most knowledgeable about AIDS, followed by avian influenza. Overall, 75% of respondents had adequate knowledge of avian influenza. The percentage was even higher (88%) among inhabitants of the Ain district, where an avian influenza epidemic had previously been reported. However, 39% expressed anxiety about this disease. In total, 20% of respondents with knowledge about avian influenza stated that they had changed their behaviours during the epizooty. Epidemics were perceived as a real threat by 27% of respondents. In the event of a highly contagious outbreak, the majority of respondents said they would follow the advice given by authorities. The study population expressed a high level of confidence in physicians and scientists, but had strong reservations about politicians, deputies and the media. CONCLUSIONS: Although the survey was conducted only four months after the avian influenza outbreak, epidemics were not perceived as a major threat by the study population. The results showed that in the event of a highly infectious disease, the population would comply with advice given by public authorities.
Authors: Mark A Schuster; Rebecca Collins; William E Cunningham; Sally C Morton; Sally Zierler; Myra Wong; Wenli Tu; David E Kanouse Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gabriel M Leung; Lai-Ming Ho; Steve K K Chan; Sai-Yin Ho; John Bacon-Shone; Ray Y L Choy; Anthony J Hedley; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Fielding Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-05-02 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: S Paxton; G Gonzales; K Uppakaew; K K Abraham; S Okta; C Green; K S Nair; T Parwati Merati; B Thephthien; M Marin; A Quesada Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2005-05
Authors: Winnie W S Mak; Phoenix K H Mo; Rebecca Y M Cheung; Jean Woo; Fanny M Cheung; Dominic Lee Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Laura Hawryluck; Wayne L Gold; Susan Robinson; Stephen Pogorski; Sandro Galea; Rima Styra Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Rebecca C Tyson; Stephanie D Hamilton; Aboubakr S Lo; Bert O Baumgaertner; Stephen M Krone Journal: Bull Math Biol Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 1.758
Authors: Dieter Van Cauteren; Sophie Vaux; Henriette de Valk; Yann Le Strat; Véronique Vaillant; Daniel Lévy-Bruhl Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 3.295