Literature DB >> 20384978

The cost-effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy compared with routine primary care for women with postnatal depression in the UK.

Matt D Stevenson1, Alison Scope, Paul A Sutcliffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of group cognitive behavior therapy (gCBT) in comparison with routine primary care for women with postnatal depression in the UK.
METHODS: Our analysis was based on a systematic literature review of the relative clinical effectiveness of gCBT compared with routine primary care and further reviews, supplemented with expert opinion of the likely cost of providing gCBT and the duration of comparative advantage for gCBT. Raw data were used to estimate a statistical relationship between changes in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS) values and changes in short-form six dimensions' (SF-6D) values. A mathematical model was constructed, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to estimate the mean cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and to evaluate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI).
RESULTS: The mean cost per QALY from the stochastic analysis was estimated to be pound36,062; however, there was considerable uncertainty around this value. The EVPI was estimated to be greater than pound64 million; the key uncertainties were in the cost per woman of providing treatment and in the statistical relationship between changes in EPDS values and changes in SF-6D values. The expected value of perfect partial information for both of these parameters was in excess of pound25 million.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the current information, the use of gCBT does not appear to be cost-effective; however, this decision is uncertain. The value of information analyses conducted indicates that further research to provide robust information on key parameters is needed and appears justified in cost-effective terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20384978     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00720.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  5 in total

Review 1.  A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.

Authors:  Lotte Steuten; Gijs van de Wetering; Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Valesca Retèl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The cost-effectiveness of depression treatment for co-occurring disorders: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Katherine E Watkins; Alison E Cuellar; Kimberly A Hepner; Sarah B Hunter; Susan M Paddock; Brett A Ewing; Erin de la Cruz
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-10-02

3.  Testing the McSad depression specific classification system in patients with somatic conditions: validity and performance.

Authors:  Katerina Papageorgiou; Karin M Vermeulen; Maya J Schroevers; Erik Buskens; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions for perinatal anxiety and/or depression: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Camacho; Gemma E Shields
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Brief Online Self-help Exercises for Postnatal Women to Improve Mood: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan Ayers; Gemima Fitzgerald; Susan Thompson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.