OBJECTIVES: This study examined the bone response of magnesium (Mg) ion-implanted implants produced using a plasma source ion implantation method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surface characteristics were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, Auger electron spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy. The screw-type titanium implants were treated with resorbable blasting media (RBM) and divided into one control group (RBM implants) and three test groups (Mg ion-implanted implants with different retained Mg doses). Twenty-four implants from each group were placed into the tibiae of 24 New Zealand white rabbits. After allowing 6 weeks for healing, the removal torque (RTQ) was measured and the implants were subjected to histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: The surface roughness and surface morphology of the test groups were similar. The Mg ion-implanted implants with a 2.3 x 10(15) ions/cm(2) retained dose showed a significantly higher RTQ than the other implants. Histomorphometric analysis indicated that the bone contact of this group was superior to the other groups. CONCLUSION: The bone response of Mg ion-implanted implant showed results superior or similar to an RBM-treated implant. The optimal Mg ion concentration that induced the strongest osseointegration was approximately 9%.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the bone response of magnesium (Mg) ion-implanted implants produced using a plasma source ion implantation method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surface characteristics were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, Auger electron spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy. The screw-type titanium implants were treated with resorbable blasting media (RBM) and divided into one control group (RBM implants) and three test groups (Mg ion-implanted implants with different retained Mg doses). Twenty-four implants from each group were placed into the tibiae of 24 New Zealand white rabbits. After allowing 6 weeks for healing, the removal torque (RTQ) was measured and the implants were subjected to histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: The surface roughness and surface morphology of the test groups were similar. The Mg ion-implanted implants with a 2.3 x 10(15) ions/cm(2) retained dose showed a significantly higher RTQ than the other implants. Histomorphometric analysis indicated that the bone contact of this group was superior to the other groups. CONCLUSION: The bone response of Mg ion-implanted implant showed results superior or similar to an RBM-treated implant. The optimal Mg ion concentration that induced the strongest osseointegration was approximately 9%.