Literature DB >> 20382972

Psychological adjustment, knowledge and unmet information needs in women undergoing PGD.

J C Karatas1, K Barlow-Stewart, B Meiser, C McMahon, K A Strong, W Hill, C Roberts, P Kelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women often enter preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) treatment following traumatic reproductive and genetic histories, the detrimental psychological effects of which are known to be long lasting in some cases. In addition, attempting IVF with PGD requires an in-depth understanding of the aspects of the technology. The level of information that is required and retained by women entering treatment is important for clinicians to understand. To date, neither of these issues has been explored empirically. To address this, we assessed mood and information-seeking behavior in a sample of women entering PGD.
METHODS: Fifty women entering PGD treatment completed self-administered questionnaires that assessed anxiety, depression, knowledge of technical aspects of PGD, expectancy of establishing a pregnancy and unmet information needs.
RESULTS: Anxiety and depression rates were similar to normal population data. State anxiety was associated with degree of financial worry [beta = 0.36, t = 2.60, P = 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.23], and living in an inner metropolitan area (beta = 0.30, P = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.32-10.81). Unmet information needs were positively associated with women's education (beta = 0.97, P = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.22-1.73). Lastly, expectancy of establishing a pregnancy was above that of what clinicians provide as realistic PGD pregnancy chances and, unexpectedly, was also associated with degree of financial worry (beta = 0.36, P = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.07-0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Women entering PGD are emotionally well adjusted although the financial costs associated with PGD are associated with increases in anxiety. The study is limited by its small sample size and the fact that partners were not assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382972     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation.

Authors:  K Haude; P McCarthy Veach; B LeRoy; H Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Patients' preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks.

Authors:  L M Pastore; C N Cordeiro Mitchell; L R Rubin; J Nicoloro-SantaBarbara; M C Genoff Garzon; M Lobel
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-10-04

5.  Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Shawn Gurtcheff; Naomi Riches; Melinda Fagan; Maya Sabatello; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-04-16

6.  Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  G De Krom; Y Severijns; W L Vlieg; Y H J M Arens; R J T Van Golde; C E M De Die-Smulders; L A D M Van Osch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.412

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.