Literature DB >> 20382468

Evaluation of biogas production from seaweed in batch tests and in UASB reactors combined with the removal of heavy metals.

Valentine Nkongndem Nkemka1, Marika Murto.   

Abstract

Seaweed can be anaerobically digested for the production of energy-rich methane. However, the use of seaweed digestate as a fertilizer may be restricted because of the high heavy metal content especially cadmium. Reducing the concentration of heavy metals in the digestate will enable its use as a fertilizer. In this laboratory-scale study, the potential of seaweed and its leachate in the production of methane were evaluated in batch tests. The effect of removing the heavy metals from seaweed leachate was evaluated in both batch test and treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. The heavy metals were removed from seaweed leachate using an imminodiacetic acid (IDA) polyacrylamide cryogel carrier. The methane yield obtained in the anaerobic digestion of seaweed was 0.12 N l CH(4)/g VS(added). The same methane yield was obtained when the seaweed leachate was used for methane production. The IDA-cryogel carrier was efficient in removing Cd(2+), Cu(2+), Ni(2+) and Zn(2+) ions from seaweed leachate. The removal of heavy metals in the seaweed leachate led to a decrease in the methane yield. The maximum sustainable organic loading rate (OLR) attained in the UASB reactor was 20.6 g tCOD/l/day corresponding to a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 h and with a total COD removal efficiency of about 81%. Hydrolysis and treatment with IDA cryogel reduced the heavy metals content in the seaweed leachate before methane production. This study also demonstrated the suitability of the treatment of seaweed leachate in a UASB reactor. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382468     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  8 in total

1.  Valorisation to biogas of macroalgal waste streams: a circular approach to bioproducts and bioenergy in Ireland.

Authors:  Silvia Tedesco; Joseph Stokes
Journal:  Chem Zvesti       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  An Overview to the Health Benefits of Seaweeds Consumption.

Authors:  Silvia Lomartire; João Carlos Marques; Ana M M Gonçalves
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.118

3.  Biomethanation of Harmful Macroalgal Biomass in Leach-Bed Reactor Coupled to Anaerobic Filter: Effect of Water Regime and Filter Media.

Authors:  Heejung Jung; Jaai Kim; Changsoo Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Process Analysis of Anaerobic Fermentation Exposure to Metal Mixtures.

Authors:  Yonglan Tian; Huayong Zhang; Lei Zheng; Shusen Li; He Hao; Meixiao Yin; Yudong Cao; Hai Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Long-Term Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Swine Manure with Corn Stover and Microbial Community Analysis.

Authors:  Haipeng Wang; Teng Teeh Lim; Cuong Duong; Wei Zhang; Congfeng Xu; Lei Yan; Zili Mei; Weidong Wang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-29

6.  Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea?

Authors:  Adam D Hughes; Maeve S Kelly; Kenneth D Black; Michele S Stanley
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Toxicity evaluation of pig slurry using luminescent bacteria and zebrafish.

Authors:  Wenyan Chen; Qiang Cai; Yuan Zhao; Guojuan Zheng; Yuting Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Polymeric Materials Used for Immobilisation of Bacteria for the Bioremediation of Contaminants in Water.

Authors:  Dmitriy Berillo; Areej Al-Jwaid; Jonathan Caplin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.329

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.