Literature DB >> 20382195

Vulnerability factors in anxiety determined through differences in active-avoidance behavior.

Kevin D Beck1, Xilu Jiao, Kevin C H Pang, Richard J Servatius.   

Abstract

The risk for developing anxiety disorders is greater in females and those individuals exhibiting a behaviorally inhibited temperament. Growth of behavioral avoidance in people is a significant predictor of symptom severity in anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Using an animal model, our lab is examining how the process of learning avoidant behavior may lead certain individuals to develop anxiety. Here we examined whether the known vulnerabilities of female sex and behaviorally inhibited temperament have individual or additive effects upon the acquisition of an active-avoidance response. A discrete trial lever-press escape-avoidance protocol was used to examine the acquisition of behavioral avoidance in male and female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and behaviorally inhibited inbred Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. Overall, WKY rats of both sexes were indistinguishable in their behavior during the acquisition of an active-avoidance response, exhibiting quicker acquisition of reinforced responses both between and within session compared to SD rats. Further WKY rats emitted more non-reinforced responses than SD rats. Sex differences were evident in SD rats in both the acquisition of the reinforced response and the emission of non-reinforced responses, with SD females acquiring the response quicker and emitting more non-reinforced responses following lever presses that led to an escape from shock. As vulnerability factors, behavioral inhibition and female sex were each associated with more prevalent reinforced and non-reinforced avoidant behavior, but an additive effect of these 2 factors was not observed. These data illustrate the importance of genetics (both strain and sex) in the assessment and modeling of anxiety vulnerability through the acquisition of active-avoidance responses and the persistence of emitting those responses in periods of non-reinforcement. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382195     DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  22 in total

1.  Variability in emotional responsiveness and coping style during active avoidance as a window onto psychological vulnerability to stress.

Authors:  Adam X Gorka; Kevin S LaBar; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  Behaviourally inhibited temperament and female sex, two vulnerability factors for anxiety disorders, facilitate conditioned avoidance (also) in humans.

Authors:  Jony Sheynin; Kevin D Beck; Kevin C H Pang; Richard J Servatius; Saima Shikari; Jacqueline Ostovich; Catherine E Myers
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Pattern of dopamine signaling during aversive events predicts active avoidance learning.

Authors:  Claire E Stelly; Graham C Haug; Kaitlyn M Fonzi; Miriam A Garcia; Sean C Tritley; Alexa P Magnon; Maria Alicia P Ramos; Matthew J Wanat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Avoidance perseveration during extinction training in Wistar-Kyoto rats: an interaction of innate vulnerability and stressor intensity.

Authors:  Xilu Jiao; Kevin C H Pang; Kevin D Beck; Thomas R Minor; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Fear conditioning fragments REM sleep in stress-sensitive Wistar-Kyoto, but not Wistar, rats.

Authors:  Jamie K DaSilva; Yanlin Lei; Vibha Madan; Graziella L Mann; Richard J Ross; Shanaz Tejani-Butt; Adrian R Morrison
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  A reinforcement-learning model of active avoidance behavior: Differences between Sprague Dawley and Wistar-Kyoto rats.

Authors:  Kevin M Spiegler; John Palmieri; Kevin C H Pang; Catherine E Myers
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sex differences in a rat model of risky decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Markie L Willis; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Dysfunction in amygdala-prefrontal plasticity and extinction-resistant avoidance: A model for anxiety disorder vulnerability.

Authors:  Jennifer E C Fragale; Veronika Khariv; Danielle M Gregor; Ian M Smith; Xilu Jiao; Stella Elkabes; Richard J Servatius; Kevin C H Pang; Kevin D Beck
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Testing the role of reward and punishment sensitivity in avoidance behavior: a computational modeling approach.

Authors:  Jony Sheynin; Ahmed A Moustafa; Kevin D Beck; Richard J Servatius; Catherine E Myers
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Facilitated acquisition of eyeblink conditioning in those vulnerable to anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Meghan D Caulfield; J Devin McAuley; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.