Literature DB >> 20381940

Soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement: a systematic review.

Christof Urs Joss1, Isabella Maria Joss-Vassalli, Stavros Kiliaridis, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present systematic review was to evaluate the soft tissue/hard tissue ratio in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation (RIF) or wire fixation (WF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta were searched. From the original 711 articles identified, 12 were finally included. Only 3 studies were prospective and 9 were retrospective. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 months to 12.7 years for RIF and 6 months to 5 years for WF.
RESULTS: The short- and long-term ratios for the lower lip to lower incisor for BSSO with RIF or WF were 50%. No difference between the short- and long-term ratios for the mentolabial-fold to point B and soft tissue pogonion to pogonion could be observed. It was a 1:1 ratio. One exception was seen for the long-term results of the soft tissue pogonion to pogonion in BSSO with RIF; they tended to be greater than a 1:1 ratio. The upper lip mainly showed retrusion but with high variability.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a large number of studies on the short- and long-term effects of mandibular advancement by BSSO, the results of the present systematic review have shown that evidence-based conclusions on soft tissue changes are still unknown. This is mostly because of the inherent problems of retrospective studies, inferior study designs, and the lack of standardized outcome measures. Well-designed prospective studies with sufficient sample sizes that have excluded patients undergoing additional surgery (ie, genioplasty or maxillary surgery) are needed. 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20381940     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Predicting soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery: The sparse partial least squares method.

Authors:  Hee-Yeon Suh; Ho-Jin Lee; Yun-Sic Lee; Soo-Heang Eo; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A better statistical method of predicting postsurgery soft tissue response in Class II patients.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Lee; Hee-Yeon Suh; Yun-Sik Lee; Shin-Jae Lee; Richard E Donatelli; Calogero Dolce; Timothy T Wheeler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Soft tissue changes and its stability as a sequlae to mandibular advancement.

Authors:  Uday Kiran Uppada; Ramen Sinha; D Sreenatha Reddy; Dushyanth Paul
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

4.  Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism.

Authors:  Lun-Jou Lo; Jing-Ling Weng; Cheng-Ting Ho; Hsiu-Hsia Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.

Authors:  Roberto Rongo; Joseph Saswat Antoun; Yi Xin Lim; George Dias; Rosa Valletta; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Robert Weiss; Andrew Read-Fuller
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-02

7.  Comparison of soft tissue simulations between two planning software programs for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Ali Modabber; Tanja Baron; Florian Peters; Kristian Kniha; Golamreza Danesh; Frank Hölzle; Nassim Ayoub; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.