Literature DB >> 20381372

Outcome of patients suffering from acute type B aortic dissection: a retrospective single-centre analysis of 135 consecutive patients.

Jens Garbade1, Moritz Jenniches, Michael A Borger, Markus J Barten, Dierk Scheinert, Matthias Gutberlet, Thomas Walther, Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Acute uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is optimally managed with medical treatment. However, surgery and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are occasionally indicated, particularly when end-organ ischaemia develops. This study assesses the perioperative and long-term outcomes of medical, interventional and surgical management of acute TBAD.
METHODS: A total of 135 consecutive patients with acute TBAD treated at our institution between 2000 and 2008 were analysed. Of these patients, 84 were treated medically (group A, median age: 65 years, interquartile range (IQR): 34-90), 46 patients received TEVAR (group B, median age: 65, IQR: 23-83) and five patients underwent open surgical management (group C, median age: 60 years, IQR: 44-69). Clinical data and information on complications, re-intervention and acute and long-term mortality were retrospectively collected and examined. Follow-up was made on 98% of patients with a median time span of 1107 days (IQR: 870-1343).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index or co-morbidities among the three treatment groups. Group B patients had the highest rate of ruptures (n=7) and impending ruptures (n=19). Indications for surgery in group C were impending rupture with malperfusion (n=1), rupture (n=2) and refractory pain (n=2). The maximal diameter of dissection was significantly higher in group C (mean: 52.6mm, IQR: 36-82, p<0.05) than in group B (mean: 42.0mm, IQR: 20-74) and group A (mean: 40.6, IQR: 23-66). The 30-day and 5-year mortality rates, respectively, were 8.5% and 27.9% for group A, 20.0% and 43.7% for group B (p=0.018 for group A) and 20.0% for both time points for group C patients. The rate of re-intervention was significantly higher in group A (A: 22/84, 26.2% vs B: 8/46, 17.4%; p=0.049, and group C: 1/5, 20%). The rate of major complications (e.g., stroke, paraplegia and/or vascular problems) did not differ among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical, interventional and surgical management for acute TBAD result in acceptable survival rates. Although stent implantation and surgery were reserved for patients with complications of TBAD in the current study, results were good for both treatment modalities. Randomised prospective trials should be performed to determine whether conservative, TEVAR or surgical management is most advantageous for complicated acute TBAD patients. Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20381372     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  13 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of early aortic remodeling in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection and intramural hematoma.

Authors:  Anna M Sailer; Patricia J Nelemans; Trevor J Hastie; Anne S Chin; Mark Huininga; Peter Chiu; Michael P Fischbein; Michael D Dake; D Craig Miller; G W Schurink; Dominik Fleischmann
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Moulakakis; Spyridon N Mylonas; Ilias Dalainas; John Kakisis; Thomas Kotsis; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

3.  Endovascular repair or best medical treatment: what is the optimal management of uncomplicated Type-B acute aortic dissection?

Authors:  María Elena Arnáiz-García; José María González-Santos; Ana María Arnáiz-García; Javier Arnáiz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Treatment of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection in the endovascular era: is it time for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Suk Jung Choo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus open chest surgical repair for patients with type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianping Liu; Juan Xia; Gaowu Yan; Yongheng Zhang; Jing Ge; Lin Cao
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  Scheduled re-entry coil embolization before entry coverage of thoracic endovascular stent grafting for aneurysmal chronic type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Keijiro Katayama; Naomichi Uchida; Shinya Takahashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-20

Review 7.  Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection.

Authors:  Scott A LeMaire; Ludivine Russell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Management of acute type B aortic dissection with malperfusion via endovascular fenestration/stenting.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Norton; David M Williams; Karen M Kim; Minhaj S Khaja; Xiaoting Wu; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Shuichiro Kaji
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.928

Review 10.  Long-term efficacy of endovascular vs open surgical repair for complicated type-B aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Zhu; B Wang; Q Meng; J Liu; S Zhai; J He
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.