O Simonin1, P-H Savoie, G Serment, F Bladou, G Karsenty. 1. Service de chirurgie urologique, hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13274 Marseille cedex 09, France.
Abstract
AIM: Evaluate urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Recent series about urinary continence were studied. RESULTS: In seven articles analyzed, continence fluctuated between 63.6 and 91.9%. Evaluation benchmarks were depending on study. Unlike self-questionnaires, objective criteria (pad test) should be more reliable. Carcinologic prognostic factors were not implicated directly. The most frequently preoperative risk factors of incontinence were: age, BMI. Peroperative parameters, attesting of surgical difficulties could have a functional impact. Bladder neck preservation could affect the recovery velocity but not functional results. Length of catheterization and lack of urinary rehabilitation could be influent. The mean of continence evaluation after radical prostatectomy was different for each study. CONCLUSION: Comparability was difficult because operative technique, group's features and mean of functional evaluation were different from study to study. Several risk factors were found but without consensus. It would be necessary to separate carcinologic and functional risk factors. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
AIM: Evaluate urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Recent series about urinary continence were studied. RESULTS: In seven articles analyzed, continence fluctuated between 63.6 and 91.9%. Evaluation benchmarks were depending on study. Unlike self-questionnaires, objective criteria (pad test) should be more reliable. Carcinologic prognostic factors were not implicated directly. The most frequently preoperative risk factors of incontinence were: age, BMI. Peroperative parameters, attesting of surgical difficulties could have a functional impact. Bladder neck preservation could affect the recovery velocity but not functional results. Length of catheterization and lack of urinary rehabilitation could be influent. The mean of continence evaluation after radical prostatectomy was different for each study. CONCLUSION: Comparability was difficult because operative technique, group's features and mean of functional evaluation were different from study to study. Several risk factors were found but without consensus. It would be necessary to separate carcinologic and functional risk factors. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Authors: Piotr L Chłosta; Tomasz Drewa; Jarosław Jaskulski; Jakub Dobruch; John Varkarakis; Andrzej Borówka Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 1.195