Literature DB >> 20380914

Risky car following in abstinent users of MDMA.

Elizabeth Dastrup1, Monica N Lees, Antoine Bechara, Jeffrey D Dawson, Matthew Rizzo.   

Abstract

Ecstasy (MDMA) use raises concerns because of its association with risky driving. We evaluated driving performance and risk taking in abstinent recreational MDMA users in a simulated car following task that required continuous attention and vigilance. Drivers were asked to follow two car lengths behind a lead vehicle (LV). Three sinusoids generated unpredictable LV velocity changes. Drivers could mitigate risk by following further behind the erratic LV. From vehicle trajectory data we performed a Fourier analysis to derive measures of coherence, gain, and delay. These measures and headway distance were compared between the different groups. All MDMA drivers met coherence criteria indicating cooperation in the car following task. They matched periodic changes in LV velocity similar to controls (abstinent THC users, abstinent alcohol users, and non-drug users), militating against worse vigilance. While all participants traveled approximately 55 mph (89 kph), the MDMA drivers followed 64 m closer to the LV and demonstrated 1.04 s shorter delays to LV velocity changes than other driver groups. The simulated car following task safely discriminated between driving behavior in abstinent MDMA users and controls. Abstinent MDMA users do not perform worse than controls, but may assume extra risk. The control theory framework used in this study revealed behaviors that might not otherwise be evident. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380914      PMCID: PMC3108507          DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  22 in total

1.  Cognitive performance in recreational users of MDMA of 'ecstasy': evidence for memory deficits.

Authors:  A C Parrott; A Lees; N J Garnham; M Jones; K Wesnes
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  Impaired perception of self-motion (heading) in abstinent ecstasy and marijuana users.

Authors:  M Rizzo; C T J Lamers; C G Sauer; J G Ramaekers; A Bechara; G J Andersen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) and driving impairment.

Authors:  B K Logan; F J Couper
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  Cognitive performance and serotonergic function in users of ecstasy.

Authors:  R J Verkes; H J Gijsman; M S Pieters; R C Schoemaker; S de Visser; M Kuijpers; E J Pennings; D de Bruin; G Van de Wijngaart; J M Van Gerven; A F Cohen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  MDMA and alcohol effects, combined and alone, on objective and subjective measures of actual driving performance and psychomotor function.

Authors:  K P C Kuypers; N Samyn; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Toxicity and deaths from 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy")

Authors:  J A Henry; K J Jeffreys; S Dawling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Chronic 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use: effects on mood and neuropsychological function?

Authors:  J H Krystal; L H Price; C Opsahl; G A Ricaurte; G R Heninger
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.829

8.  Ecstasy (MDMA) effects upon mood and cognition: before, during and after a Saturday night dance.

Authors:  A C Parrott; J Lasky
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Cognitive function and mood in MDMA/THC users, THC users and non-drug using controls.

Authors:  C T J Lamers; A Bechara; M Rizzo; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 10.  Risky business: emotion, decision-making, and addiction.

Authors:  Antoine Bechara
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2003
View more
  4 in total

1.  DIFFERENCES IN SIMULATED CAR FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR OF YOUNGER AND OLDER DRIVERS.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dastrup; Monica N Lees; Jeffrey D Dawson; John D Lee; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des       Date:  2009

2.  The effect of d,l-methamphetamine on simulated driving performance.

Authors:  Beata Y Silber; Rodney J Croft; Luke A Downey; David A Camfield; Katherine Papafotiou; Phillip Swann; Con Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Risk factors associated with driving under the influence of drugs in the USA.

Authors:  Toni Marie Rudisill; Gordon S Smith
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.