Literature DB >> 20380608

Agreement and reproducibility in identification of endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging.

Luca Saba1, Stefano Guerriero, Rosa Sulcis, Silvia Ajossa, Gianbenedetto Melis, Giorgio Mallarini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising technique in the study of endometriosis, allowing a complete mapping of lesions before surgery. However, the value of MRI in the diagnosis of endometriosis in the bladder, in superficial peritoneal lesions, and in ovarian foci and uterosacral ligaments is still under debate.
PURPOSE: To assess inter- and intra-observer agreement in the evaluation of endometriosis in different anatomical locations using MRI.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 2006 to February 2008, 83 female patients (mean age 39, range 19-49 years) who had undergone MRI examination for suspected endometriosis were evaluated by two radiologists. MRI at 1.5 Tesla was performed with SE and TSE sequences, T1- and T2-weighted with and without fat suppression. Each examination was completed with gadolinium administration. Each dataset was independently evaluated by the radiologists for the presence or absence of endometriosis. The location (ovaries, uterosacral ligaments (USLs), pouch of Douglas, vagina, rectosigmoid, rectovaginal septum, and bladder) of suspected lesions was recorded. Cohen kappa statistical analysis was performed to calculate agreement between measurements. After 2 months the data were analyzed again by the two observers to assess intra-observer agreement.
RESULTS: Of the 83 MRI examinations performed, 12 patients demonstrated no evidence of endometriosis. In the remaining 71 studies, 157 endometriotic lesions ranging in size from 0.4 to 6.2 cm were detected. Of the 157 lesions, 53 (33.75% incidence) were smaller than 1 cm. In the ovaries, the inter-observer agreement was 92.77% and the kappa value was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.695-0.91). In the bladder the inter-observer agreement was 96.39% and the kappa value was 0.553 (95% CI 0.056-1). In the USLs the inter-observer agreement was 90.96% and the kappa value 0.583 (95% CI, 0.381-0.784). In the rectovaginal septum the inter-observer agreement was 94.58% and the kappa value 0.739 (95% CI, 0.572-0.905). In the rectovaginal pouch the inter-observer agreement was 88.55% and the kappa value 0.608 (95% CI, 0.443-0.774). In the vaginal fornix the inter-observer agreement was 94.58% and the kappa value 0.726 (95% CI, 0.552-0.901). In the rectosigmoid the inter-observer agreement was 89.76% and the kappa value 0.589 (95% CI, 0.389-0.768).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that MRI has a high inter- and intra-observer agreement in the identification of endometriosis located in the ovary, rectosigmoid, and rectovaginal septum, whereas the agreement is suboptimal for the identification of endometriosis located in the USLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380608     DOI: 10.3109/02841851003657343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Rosa Sulcis; Gian Benedetto Melis; Giannina Ibba; Juan Luis Alcazar; Mario Piga; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  Does the clinical information play a role in the magnetic resonance diagnostic confidence analysis of ovarian and deep endometriosis?

Authors:  Luca Saba; Silvia Ajossa; Giuseppe Ledda; Antonella Balestrieri; Federica Schirru; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Jasjit S Suri; Gian Benedetto Melis; Francesco Lavra; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  MRI and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate?

Authors:  Veronica Celli; Miriam Dolciami; Roberta Ninkova; Giada Ercolani; Stefania Rizzo; Maria Grazia Porpora; Carlo Catalano; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  The importance and perspective of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bianek-Bodzak; Edyta Szurowska; Sambor Sawicki; Marcin Liro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions.

Authors:  E Bean; P Chaggar; N Thanatsis; W Dooley; C Bottomley; D Jurkovic
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  A review of more than 2000 cases of site-specific pelvic endometriosis rates by MRI: a guide to minimizing under/overdiagnosis non-invasively.

Authors:  Azadeh Hajati; Omid Hajati
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-08-08

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging presentation of deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules before and after pregnancy: A case series.

Authors:  Anne Elodie Millischer; Louis Marcellin; Pietro Santulli; Chloe Maignien; Mathilde Bourdon; Bruno Borghese; François Goffinet; Charles Chapron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.