BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because thrombosis and stenosis are the most frequent causes of arteriovenous graft (AVG) failure, several externally supported grafts were designed to enhance incompressibility and kinking resistance to improve the patency. However, consensus on advantage of these modifications having still not been reached might relate to the previous limited patient numbers and small studies. This study analyzed the longevity of externally supported and nonsupported AVG on the basis of the nationwide database to understand whether the externally supported design could improve the duration of patency of AVG. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Adult incident patients (n = 4402) were retrospectively enrolled who had began hemodialysis between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2005. All incident patients with AVG, before or after beginning regular hemodialysis, between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 were identified. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the longevity of externally supported and nonsupported AVG by controlling other covariates. RESULTS: There were 990 patients with externally supported AVG and 3412 patients with nonsupported AVG. The patency rates of externally supported AVG were 49.4%, 31.6%, and 20.2% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively; those of nonsupported AVG were 31.9%, 17.4%, and 10.8%. The survival of nonsupported AVG was significantly inferior to that of externally supported AVG. CONCLUSIONS: Externally supported AVG are superior to nonsupported AVG for long-term patency. The incompressibility and kinking resistance of ringed grafts may shed light on a direction for the future development of dialysis graft design.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because thrombosis and stenosis are the most frequent causes of arteriovenous graft (AVG) failure, several externally supported grafts were designed to enhance incompressibility and kinking resistance to improve the patency. However, consensus on advantage of these modifications having still not been reached might relate to the previous limited patient numbers and small studies. This study analyzed the longevity of externally supported and nonsupported AVG on the basis of the nationwide database to understand whether the externally supported design could improve the duration of patency of AVG. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Adult incident patients (n = 4402) were retrospectively enrolled who had began hemodialysis between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2005. All incident patients with AVG, before or after beginning regular hemodialysis, between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 were identified. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the longevity of externally supported and nonsupported AVG by controlling other covariates. RESULTS: There were 990 patients with externally supported AVG and 3412 patients with nonsupported AVG. The patency rates of externally supported AVG were 49.4%, 31.6%, and 20.2% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively; those of nonsupported AVG were 31.9%, 17.4%, and 10.8%. The survival of nonsupported AVG was significantly inferior to that of externally supported AVG. CONCLUSIONS: Externally supported AVG are superior to nonsupported AVG for long-term patency. The incompressibility and kinking resistance of ringed grafts may shed light on a direction for the future development of dialysis graft design.
Authors: Pradeep Arora; Annamaria T Kausz; Gregorio T Obrador; Robin Ruthazer; Samina Khan; Constance S Jenuleson; Klemens B Meyer; Brian J G Pereira Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Bradley S Dixon; Gerald J Beck; Miguel A Vazquez; Arthur Greenberg; James A Delmez; Michael Allon; Laura M Dember; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Jennifer J Gassman; Tom Greene; Milena K Radeva; Ingemar J Davidson; T Alp Ikizler; Gregory L Braden; Andrew Z Fenves; James S Kaufman; James R Cotton; Kevin J Martin; James W McNeil; Asif Rahman; Jeffery H Lawson; James F Whiting; Bo Hu; Catherine M Meyers; John W Kusek; Harold I Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard Johnson; Yonghui Ding; Naveen Nagiah; Eric Monnet; Wei Tan Journal: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 7.328
Authors: Austin J Pourmoussa; Ashwin M Mahendra; Constantino S Peña; Alex Powell; Brian J Schiro; Raul Herrera; Barry T Katzen; Govindarajan Narayanan; Andrew S Niekamp; Ripal T Gandhi Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Christi M Terry; Ilya Zhuplatov; Yuxia He; Tze-Chein Wun; Seong-Eun Kim; Alfred K Cheung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Manuel Carlos Martins Castro; Francisca Tokiko Yanagida Carlquist; Celina de Fátima Silva; Magdaleni Xagoraris; Jerônimo Ruiz Centeno; José Adilson Camargo de Souza Journal: J Bras Nefrol Date: 2019-12-09