Literature DB >> 2037842

Correlates of performance on the Gollin and Mooney tests of visual closure.

N Foreman1.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-seven undergraduate students variously performed a computerized version of the Gollin (1960) Incomplete Figures Test, the Mooney (1957) Test of Incomplete Face Perception, the Poppelreuter (1917) Overlapping Figures Test, and a visual search task. Performance of male subjects was superior to that of female subjects on the Mooney test but inferior on the visual search task. Correlation and regression analyses showed that the only significant predictor of Gollin test scores was latency to identify all items in the Overlapping Figures Test. There was no relationship between performances on the Gollin and Mooney tests or between Gollin or Mooney test performance and visual search latency. The Gollin and Mooney tests appear to access different perceptual processes, none of which is dependent on the efficiency of visual search.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037842     DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1991.9711129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  9 in total

1.  The threshold signal:noise ratio in the perception of fragmented figures.

Authors:  A V Merkul'ev; S V Pronin; L A Semenov; N Foreman; V N Chikhman; Yu E Shelepin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01

2.  Analysis of the studies of the perception of fragmented images: global description and perception using local features.

Authors:  Yu E Shelepin; V N Chikhman; N Foreman
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-06-11

3.  Studies of the perception of incomplete outline images of different sizes.

Authors:  O A Vakhrameeva; Yu E Shelepin; A Yu Mezentsev; S V Pronin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

4.  Increased face detection responses on the mooney faces test in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Albert R Powers; Philip R Corlett; Steven M Silverstein; Judy L Thompson; James M Gold; Jason Schiffman; James A Waltz; Trevor F Williams; Richard E Zinbarg; Vijay A Mittal; Lauren M Ellman; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Jason A Levin; Eren Kafadar; Joshua Kenney; Dillon Smith
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Age-dependent face detection and face categorization performance.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Martina Grüter; Thomas Grüter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mooney face stimuli for visual perception research.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Lucia Melloni; Aaron Schurger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Characterizing cognitive aging in humans with links to animal models.

Authors:  Gene E Alexander; Lee Ryan; Dawn Bowers; Thomas C Foster; Jennifer L Bizon; David S Geldmacher; Elizabeth L Glisky
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Face-n-Food: Gender Differences in Tuning to Faces.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Klaus Scheffler; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Individual differences in the detection, matching and memory of faces.

Authors:  Matthew C Fysh
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.