Literature DB >> 20377962

Prevalence and biomolecular characterization of Campylobacter spp. isolated from retail meat.

Michela Lucia Sammarco1, Giancarlo Ripabelli, Incoronata Fanelli, Guido Maria Grasso, Manuela Tamburro.   

Abstract

We estimated the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in retail meat (n = 352 samples; 104 chicken, 106 pork, and 142 beef) collected in Campobasso, Italy, comparing two microbiological methods. All the isolates were characterized by biomolecular techniques for epidemiological purposes. Campylobacter isolation was performed by selective culture and membrane filtration methods. Phenotypic and genotypic methods for genus and species identification were evaluated together with antimicrobial resistance and plasmid profiling. Sixty-nine (86.2%) samples were positive by selective culture, 49 (61.2%) by membrane filtration, and 38 (47.5%) by both methods. Only 74 of 80 strains were confirmed as Campylobacter spp. by PCR, and two Campylobacter coli were identified as Campylobacter jejuni. Chicken meat was more frequently contaminated than other meats. Selective culture was more sensitive than membrane filtration (85 versus 66%), and specificity of the methods was 98 and 100%, respectively. Among Campylobacter isolates from chicken meat, 86.5% were multidrug resistant. Resistance to ciprofloxacin (51.3%) and enrofloxacin (52.7%) was lower than to nalidixic acid (71.6%). C. coli strains showed the highest cross-resistance for quinolones (82.6%) and fluoroquinolones (60.9%) as well as a high resistance to tetracycline. Plasmids were isolated from six C. coli and two C. jejuni isolates, but no association was detected between antimicrobial resistance and plasmid DNA carriage. Selective culture is considered as the optimal method for Campylobacter isolation, although it was unable to detect all contaminated samples. Membrane filtration provided more specific results but with low sensitivity. A combination of both techniques may offer better results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20377962     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.4.720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Campylobacter spp. on Ham in Korea.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Jimyeong Ha; Sejeong Kim; Heeyoung Lee; Soomin Lee; Yohan Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry Meat at Retail and Processing Plants' Levels in Central Italy.

Authors:  Ziad Mezher; Stefano Saccares; Rita Marcianò; Paola De Santis; Eda Maria Flores Rodas; Veronica De Angelis; Roberto Condoleo
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Investigating locally relevant risk factors for Campylobacter infection in Australia: protocol for a case-control study and genomic analysis.

Authors:  Liana Varrone; Russell J Stafford; Kim Lilly; Linda Selvey; Kathryn Glass; Laura Ford; Dieter Bulach; Martyn D Kirk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in chicken and bovine meat in Italy: Prevalence, level of contamination and molecular characterization of isolates.

Authors:  Elisabetta Di Giannatale; Paolo Calistri; Guido Di Donato; Lucia Decastelli; Elisa Goffredo; Daniela Adriano; Maria Emanuela Mancini; Annamaria Galleggiante; Diana Neri; Salvatore Antoci; Cristina Marfoglia; Francesca Marotta; Roberta Nuvoloni; Giacomo Migliorati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.