Literature DB >> 20377576

A multiphase design strategy for dealing with participation bias.

S Haneuse1, J Chen.   

Abstract

A recently funded study of the impact of oral contraceptive use on the risk of bone fracture employed the randomized recruitment scheme of Weinberg and Wacholder (1990, Biometrics 46, 963-975). One potential complication in the bone fracture study is the potential for differential response rates between cases and controls; participation rates in previous, related studies have been around 70%. Although data from randomized recruitment schemes may be analyzed within the two-phase study framework, ignoring potential differential participation may lead to biased estimates of association. To overcome this, we build on the two-phase framework and propose an extension by introducing an additional stage of data collection aimed specifically at addressing potential differential participation. Four estimators that correct for both sampling and participation bias are proposed; two are general purpose and two are for the special case where covariates underlying the participation mechanism are discrete. Because the fracture study is ongoing, we illustrate the methods using infant mortality data from North Carolina.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20377576      PMCID: PMC3347701          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Multiple outputation: inference for complex clustered data by averaging analyses from independent data.

Authors:  Dean Follmann; Michael Proschan; Eric Leifer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  The design and analysis of case-control studies with biased sampling.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; S Wacholder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Analytic methods for two-stage case-control studies and other stratified designs.

Authors:  W D Flanders; S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Pearl; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  On a supplemented case-control design.

Authors:  Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The effect of response bias on the odds ratio.

Authors:  M A Austin; M H Criqui; E Barrett-Connor; M J Holdbrook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Matched case-control data analysis with selection bias.

Authors:  I F Lin; M C Paik
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Learning About Missing Data Mechanisms in Electronic Health Records-based Research: A Survey-based Approach.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Andy Bogart; Ina Jazic; Emily O Westbrook; Denise Boudreau; Mary Kay Theis; Greg E Simon; David Arterburn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  BAYESIAN SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR TWO-PHASE STUDIES OF GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION.

Authors:  Jaeil Ahn; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stephen B Gruber; Malay Ghosh
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Mode of first delivery and women's intentions for subsequent childbearing: findings from the First Baby Study.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Diana L Velott; Junjia Zhu; Cynthia H Chuang; Marianne M Hillemeier; Ian M Paul; John T Repke
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.980

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.