Literature DB >> 20377292

Investigating task-dependent top-down effects on overt visual attention.

Torsten Betz1, Tim C Kietzmann, Niklas Wilming, Peter König.   

Abstract

Different tasks can induce different viewing behavior, yet it is still an open question how or whether at all high-level task information interacts with the bottom-up processing of stimulus-related information. Two possible causal routes are considered in this paper. Firstly, the weak top-down hypothesis, according to which top-down effects are mediated by changes of feature weights in the bottom-up system. Secondly, the strong top-down hypothesis, which proposes that top-down information acts independently of the bottom-up process. To clarify the influences of these different routes, viewing behavior was recorded on web pages for three different tasks: free viewing, content awareness, and information search. The data reveal significant task-dependent differences in viewing behavior that are accompanied by minor changes in feature-fixation correlations. Extensive computational modeling shows that these small but significant changes are insufficient to explain the observed differences in viewing behavior. Collectively, the results show that task-dependent differences in the current setting are not mediated by a reweighting of features in the bottom-up hierarchy, ruling out the weak top-down hypothesis. Consequently, the strong top-down hypothesis is the most viable explanation for the observed data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20377292     DOI: 10.1167/10.3.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.

Authors:  Shuichiro Taya; David Windridge; Magda Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Beyond correlation: do color features influence attention in rainforest?

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Kerstin Wirz; Verena Willenbockel; Torsten Betz; Cornell Schreiber; Tomasz Troscianko; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Developmental Changes in Natural Viewing Behavior: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Differences between Children, Young Adults and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alper Açık; Adjmal Sarwary; Rafael Schultze-Kraft; Selim Onat; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25

4.  Oculomotor evidence for top-down control following the initial saccade.

Authors:  Alisha Siebold; Wieske van Zoest; Mieke Donk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Overt attention and context factors: the impact of repeated presentations, image type, and individual motivation.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Measures and limits of models of fixation selection.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Torsten Betz; Tim C Kietzmann; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Combined contributions of feedforward and feedback inputs to bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Peyman Khorsand; Tirin Moore; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-02

8.  Emotions and personality traits as high-level factors in visual attention: a review.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Saccadic momentum and facilitation of return saccades contribute to an optimal foraging strategy.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Simon Harst; Nico Schmidt; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The contributions of image content and behavioral relevancy to overt attention.

Authors:  Selim Onat; Alper Açık; Frank Schumann; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.