Literature DB >> 20376650

[Epidemiology and etiology of male urinary incontinence].

C Hampel1, J W Thüroff, R Gillitzer.   

Abstract

Compared to female urinary incontinence, the prevalence and socioeconomic impact of male urinary incontinence has not gained much attention from epidemiologists. Moreover, the few available epidemiological surveys vary in their use of definitions and methodology, which are known to have great impact on the resulting prevalences. Therefore, the interpretation of the findings is difficult. Depending on definitions and methods, the prevalence of male urinary incontinence ranges between 5.4 and 15%. Urgency incontinence is the predominant subtype in all age groups, although the relative proportion shifts towards stress incontinence with rising age. Neurological and posttraumatic causes for male stress incontinence become less important as the frequency of iatrogenic interventions (radiation, prostate surgery) increase. Additional risk factors for male urinary incontinence are age, immobility, and neurological diseases. Surgery of the prostate (TURP, radical prostatectomy) is especially associated with postoperative urinary incontinence if bladder and/or sphincter dysfunctions are preexisting, if the patient is particularly old, and the surgeon's experience is limited. The etiology of male urgency incontinence comprises detrusor instability caused by obstruction, age-related detrusor degeneration, insufficient inhibitory CNS control over afferent detrusor overstimulation, and neurological diseases. The pathophysiological key factors of male continence are functional urethral length and maximum closure pressure, the preservation of which should receive the unrestricted attention of every prostate surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20376650     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2263-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  19 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity in epidemiological investigations of bladder control problems: a problem of definition.

Authors:  C Hampel; D Wienhold; S E Dahms; J W Thuroff
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  First report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1976-02

4.  Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults.

Authors:  A R Herzog; A C Diokno; M B Brown; D P Normolle; B M Brock
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-03

5.  Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study.

Authors:  Debra E Irwin; Ian Milsom; Steinar Hunskaar; Kate Reilly; Zoe Kopp; Sender Herschorn; Karin Coyne; Con Kelleher; Christian Hampel; Walter Artibani; Paul Abrams
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The results of prostatectomy: a symptomatic and urodynamic analysis of 152 patients.

Authors:  P H Abrams; D J Farrar; R T Turner-Warwick; C G Whiteside; R C Feneley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  A neurologic basis for the overactive bladder.

Authors:  W C de Groat
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  [Diabetes mellitus and bladder function. What should be considered?].

Authors:  C Hampel; R Gillitzer; S Pahernik; S Melchior; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Urinary urgency and reflex incontinence].

Authors:  H Madersbacher
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Urodynamic evaluation of incontinence in patients undergoing modified Campbell radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  D C Rudy; J R Woodside; E D Crawford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Treatment for overactive bladder].

Authors:  P Rothe; M Kalchthaler; S Mühlich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Prevention of postprostatectomy incontinence: etiology and risk factors].

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Hüsch; M Reiter; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: do older patients have an increased risk?].

Authors:  H Borrusch; G Müller; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Gap between postulated and real outcome quality of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  C Hampel; F Roos; J W Thüroff; A Neisius
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.