| Literature DB >> 20376169 |
Thomas J Grahame, Richard B Schlesinger.
Abstract
A major public health goal is to determine linkages between specific pollution sources and adverse health outcomes. This paper provides an integrative evaluation of the database examining effects of vehicular emissions, such as black carbon (BC), carbonaceous gasses, and ultrafine PM, on cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Less than a decade ago, few epidemiological studies had examined effects of traffic emissions specifically on these health endpoints. In 2002, the first of many studies emerged finding significantly higher risks of CV morbidity and mortality for people living in close proximity to major roadways, vs. those living further away. Abundant epidemiological studies now link exposure to vehicular emissions, characterized in many different ways, with CV health endpoints such as cardiopulmonary and ischemic heart disease and circulatory-disease-associated mortality; incidence of coronary artery disease; acute myocardial infarction; survival after heart failure; emergency CV hospital admissions; and markers of atherosclerosis. We identify numerous in vitro, in vivo, and human panel studies elucidating mechanisms which could explain many of these cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associations. These include: oxidative stress, inflammation, lipoperoxidation and atherosclerosis, change in heart rate variability (HRV), arrhythmias, ST-segment depression, and changes in vascular function (such as brachial arterial caliber and blood pressure). Panel studies with accurate exposure information, examining effects of ambient components of vehicular emissions on susceptible human subjects, appear to confirm these mechanisms. Together, this body of evidence supports biological mechanisms which can explain the various CV epidemiological findings. Based upon these studies, the research base suggests that vehicular emissions are a major environmental cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the United States. As a means to reduce the public health consequences of such emissions, it may be desirable to promulgate a black carbon (BC) PM(2.5) standard under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which would apply to both on and off-road diesels. Two specific critical research needs are identified. One is to continue research on health effects of vehicular emissions, gaseous as well as particulate. The second is to utilize identical or nearly identical research designs in studies using accurate exposure metrics to determine whether other major PM pollutant sources and types may also underlie the specific health effects found in this evaluation for vehicular emissions.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20376169 PMCID: PMC2844969 DOI: 10.1007/s11869-009-0047-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health ISSN: 1873-9318 Impact factor: 3.763
Vehicular emissions and heart rate variability changes
| Study | Subject exposure method | Characterization of HRV changes | BC levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. In vivo animal study | |||
| 1. Anselme et al. ( | Healthy and CHF rats exposed to diesel emissions | Immediate decrease in RMSSD in both CHF and healthy rats immediately after exposure, returning to baseline after 2.5 h | BC not measured |
| B. Human studies with accurate exposure | |||
| 1. Schwartz et al. ( | Subjects lived adjacent to same urban road to which monitor was adjacent, less than 1 km distant | Monotonic decrease in SDNN with increase in BC exposure; significant BC associations in seven of eight tests (SDNN, RMSSD, PNN50, LF/HF, 1 and 24-h averages); no significant associations in eight tests for PM2.5 without BC (“non-traffic secondary particles”) | BC mean = 1.2 |
| 2. Adar et al. ( | Monitor followed subjects during activities, in residence at night | For change of one IQR, BC significantly associated with changes in all six measures of HRV, for both 5-min and 24-h means; sharply increased exposure to BC when subjects on buses associated with changes of similar magnitude in all six HRV measures (decreases in SDNN, PNN50 + 1, RMSSD, LF, and HF; increase in LF/HF), similar to Schwartz et al. ( | BC mean not given; BC IQR for all periods was 330 ng/m3; for bus periods, IQR was 2911 ng/m3 |
| 3. Riediker et al. ( | Presence of young patrol officers in vehicle for 9 h before tests | Significant increases in SDNN, PNN50 associated with “speed change” source factor, (braking and diesel emissions), but not “crustal,” “steel wear” or gasoline factors | BC not measured |
| 4. Ebelt et al. ( | Personal monitors in panel study in Vancouver | Estimated non-sulfate urban PM2.5 associated with decreased RMMSD, sulfate not associated | BC not measured |
| C. Human studies using central monitors not far from street level (horizontal exposure misclassification) | |||
| 1. Wheeler et al. ( | Central monitor for greater Atlanta area subjects | EC associated with SDNN changes in only one of four tests, NO2 in only 4 of 13 tests; authors discuss exposure error due to spatial variability of NO2, note “this greater exposure error is consistent with the fact that traffic, which varies spatially over short distances, is a significant source of outdoor NO2.” | EC mean = 1.6 μg/m3 |
| 2. Park et al. ( | Central monitor for subjects living within 40 km of monitor | BC associated with one of four measures of HRV changes; exposure discussed in context of PM2.5 (little exposure error) but not discussed for BC | BC mean = 0.92 μg/m3 |
| D. Studies using highly elevated central monitors (horizontal and vertical exposure misclassification) | |||
| 1. Luttmann-Gibson et al. ( | Central monitor elevated 400 feet above town where subjects lived, a mile from monitor | For IQR change in PM2.5 or sulfate, significant reductions in SDNN, RMSSD, HF, and LF (sulfate borderline for LF), no associations for BC; exposure error not discussed | BC mean = 1.0 μg/m3 |
SDNN standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, RMSSD square root of mean squared difference between adjacent normal-to-normal intervals, PNN50 percentage of adjacent normal-to-normal intervals differing by more than 50 ms, HF high-frequency power, LF low frequency power, LF/HF ratio LF to HF, RR risk ratio, OR odds ratio, IQR interquartile range increase, SD standard deviation
Fig. 1SDNN monotonically decreases with increased PM2.5 when PM2.5 is highly correlated with BC, but is not affected by rising levels of PM2.5 when PM2.5 is higher and correlated with regional PM, but not BC [from Schwartz et al. (2005b), reproduced with permission]
Vehicular emissions and arrhythmia risks
| Study | Subject exposure method | Risks of arrhythmia |
|---|---|---|
| A. In vivo animal study | ||
| 1. Anselme et al. ( | CHF rats exposed to diesel emissions; no effect in healthy rats | 200% to 500% increase in ventricular premature beats, persisting up to 5 h after exposure |
| B. Human studies with accurate exposure | ||
| 1. Albert et al. ( | Presence in vehicle before ICD events | RR of ICD shock in hour after driving =2.24; RR of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in half hour after driving =4.46 |
| 2. Riediker et al. ( | Presence of young patrol officers in vehicle for 9 h before tests | ∼ 40% increase in SVE beats per change of one SD in “speed change” source factor (braking and diesel emissions), but not in “crustal,” “steel wear” or “gasoline” factors |
| 3. Ebelt et al. ( | Personal monitors in panel study in Vancouver area | Ambient and estimated PM2.5, non-sulfate PM2.5 each associated with ∼ln 0.2 SVE effect estimate; sulfate not associateda |
| C. Human studies using central monitors not far from street level (horizontal exposure misclassification) | ||
| 1. Peters et al. ( | Central monitor for eastern Massachusetts area subjects | Risks highest for NO2 and BC, then PM2.5; results seen by authors as related predominantly to traffic emissions; OR of ICD shock 2 days later =1.8 for 26 ppb increase in NO2; due to single monitor, authors’ expectation would have been to bias estimates of gaseous emissions toward null |
| 2. Dockery et al. ( | Central monitor for subjects living within 40 km of monitor in Boston | Ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with BC, NO2, CO, and PM2.5, for those with an arrhythmia in previous 3 days, authors see these as indicative of vehicular emissions; for BC, OR = 1.74 for increase of 0.74 |
| 3. Metzger et al. ( | Central monitor data for patients living in metro Atlanta area | No associations with ICD events with PM2.5, NO2, CO, EC, OC, SO4; exposure misclassification discussed, study “does not contribute evidence regarding whether personal exposure may be a determinant of ventricular tachyarrhythmia” |
| 4. Rich et al. ( | Central monitor for subjects living within 40 km of monitor in Boston | No risk associations for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes with PM2.5, NO2, BC, CO, or SO2; associations only with ozone; small number of episodes, thus reduced statistical power discussed, but exposure misclassification not discussed |
| D. Studies using highly elevated central monitors (horizontal and vertical exposure misclassification) | ||
| 1. Sarnat et al. ( | Central monitor elevated 400 feet above town where subjects lived, a mile from monitor | For 5-day moving average in pollution concentration, OR for having an SVE = 1.42 for PM2.5; 1.70 for sulfate; no associations for BC |
RR risk ratio; OR odds ratio; IQR interquartile range increase; ICD implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; SVE supraventricular ectopy; SD standard deviation
aAssociation taken from Fig. 2 in Ebelt et al. (2005). Association in Ebelt et al. also reported [in Sarnat et al. (2006)] as a 22% increase in rate of SVE for subjects whose mean rate of SVE was 33 bph
Summary of effects of vehicular emissions and black carbon on CVD health endpoints
| Health endpoint | In vitro studies | In vivo studies | Human panel studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Oxidative stress | Li et al. | McDonald et al. | Mills et al. |
| Li et al. | Delfino et al. | ||
| Li et al. | |||
| 2. HRV alteration | NA | Anselme et al. | Adar et al. |
| Schwartz et al. | |||
| Creason et al. | |||
| Ebelt et al. | |||
| In studies using central monitors, Wheeler et al. ( | |||
| Park et al. ( | |||
| 3. ST-segment Depression | NA | Yan et al. | Mills et al. |
| Gold et al. | |||
| Lanki et al. | |||
| 4. Cardiac Arrhythmia | NA | Anselme et al. | Albert et al. |
| Riediker et al. | |||
| Ebelt et al. ( | |||
| Peters et al. ( | |||
| 5. Vascular Function | Miller et al. | Bartoli et al. | Urch et al. |
| Campen et al. | Urch et al. | ||
| Auchincloss et al. | |||
| Lai et al. | |||
| Peretz et al. | |||
| Peretz et al. | |||
| 6. Inflammation | Bonvallot et al. | McDonald et al. | Delfino et al. |
| Riediker et al. | |||
| Riediker | |||
| Tornquist et al. | |||
| Zeka et al. | |||
| 7. Atherosclerosis and lipoperoxidation | See oxidative stress and inflammation sections for in vitro work relevant to atherosclerosis, caused in large part by systemic interaction of oxidative stress and inflammation | Araujo et al. | Sharman et al. |
| Gong et al. | Gong et al. | Delfino et al. | |
| Huang et al. |