Literature DB >> 20375748

Contact lens hydrophobicity and roughness effects on bacterial adhesion.

Maria J Giraldez1, Carlos Garcia Resua, Madalena Lira, M Elisabete C D Real Oliveira, Beatriz Magariños, Alicia E Toranzo, Eva Yebra-Pimentel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess whether hydrogel contact lens (CL) surface hydrophobicity and roughness affect Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion.
METHODS: Bacterial adhesion experiments were performed on two unworn silicone hydrogel and three unworn conventional hydrogel CLs using the S.epidermidis strain CECT 4184. Microbial colonization was assessed by conducting counts expressed as colony-forming units. CL hydrophobicity was determined through water contact angle measurements and the roughness parameters such as mean surface roughness (Ra), kurtosis (Rku), and skewness (Rsk) were determined through atomic force microscopy in Tapping Mode.
RESULTS: The conventional CLs showed similar water contact angles (p > 0.05) and were classified as hydrophilic. The silicone hydrogel CLs yielded hydrophobic contact angles with no significant differences between them (p > 0.05). The lenses with the highest (nelfilcon A and ocufilcon B) or lowest (comfilcon A and omafilcon A) Ra values displayed a lesser or greater extent of spikiness of their surfaces, respectively. All lenses showed a predominance of peaks (Rsk > 0) over troughs. S. epidermidis adhered more to the hydrophobic CLs (p < 0.05). Omafilcon A and comfilcon A, which showed the lowest Ra values among the hydrophilic and hydrophobic lenses, respectively, returned the lowest bacterial adhesion scores (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that more hydrophobic CLs are more prone to S. epidermidis adhesion. Although the Ra appears to be related to S. epidermidis adhesion, the influence of Rku and Rsk on this variable remains unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20375748     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181da8656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  Reduction in protein absorption on ophthalmic lenses by PEGDA bulk modification of silicone acrylate-based formulation.

Authors:  Fahimeh Askari; Mojgan Zandi; Parvin Shokrolahi; Mitra Hashemi Tabatabaei; Elnaz Hajirasoliha
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2019-08-14

2.  Dexamethasone diffusion across contact lenses is inhibited by Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vitro.

Authors:  Kimberly M Brothers; Amy C Nau; Eric G Romanowski; Robert M Q Shanks
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.

Authors:  Debarun Dutta; Nerida Cole; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.367

4.  Scanning Electron Microscopy Findings With Energy-Dispersive X-ray Investigations of Cosmetically Tinted Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Fumika Hotta; Hiroshi Eguchi; Shoji Imai; Tatsuro Miyamoto; Sayaka Mitamura-Aizawa; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  Adhesion of Acanthamoeba on Cosmetic Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Seung Mok Lee; Ji Eun Lee; Da In Lee; Hak Sun Yu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  In Vitro Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria from Suspected External Eye Infected Patients Attending Ophthalmology Clinic, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Kuma Diriba; Tesfaye Kassa; Yared Alemu; Sisay Bekele
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18

7.  Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  Auemphon Mordmuang; Lunla Udomwech; Kulwadee Karnjana
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-08

8.  A laboratory assessment of factors that affect bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.

Authors:  Debarun Dutta; Mark Dp Willcox
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-01

9.  Comparison of Antibacterial Adhesion When Salivary Pellicle Is Coated on Both Poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate)- and Polyethylene-glycol-methacrylate-grafted Poly(methyl methacrylate).

Authors:  Bor-Shiunn Lee; Yu-Jia Chen; Ta-Chin Wei; Tien-Li Ma; Che-Chen Chang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Therapeutic Contact Lenses with Polymeric Vehicles for Ocular Drug Delivery: A Review.

Authors:  Seung Woo Choi; Jaeyun Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.