Literature DB >> 20373828

An adaptive design for phase II non-oncology dose selection clinical trials.

Zheng Su1.   

Abstract

A non-oncology dose selection phase II trial tests multiple active doses in a controlled fashion, and it not only needs to determine whether the treatment is effective but also to select the 'lowest efficacious' dose if the treatment is indeed efficacious. Few approaches exist in the literature for designing phase II non-oncology dose selection trials, and the standard design with a fixed sample size has been widely used. The objective of this study was to develop a more efficient design for phase II dose selection trials that terminates the trial early for futility and adjusts the sample size and number of doses at interim analyses when appropriate. One-sided statistical tests and confidence intervals were used to develop an adaptive design for non-oncology phase II dose selection trials. With several interim analyses built in, the adaptive design uses accumulated data to determine, at each interim analysis, whether the highest dose is efficacious and whether the low doses are as efficacious as the highest dose. Once a confident answer to either or both of these questions can be obtained, the trial may either be terminated early or some of the lower doses may be dropped to prevent assigning more patients to inferior doses and thus reduce the total sample size needed. Theoretical analyses and simulation studies show that the proposed adaptive design significantly outperforms the standard design with a fixed sample size. The proposed adaptive design should be preferred over the standard design especially in cases where enrolment is slow and efficacy can be measured after a relatively short period of time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373828     DOI: 10.1007/bf03256909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  8 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The determinatio of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1961-04

3.  Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  T T Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

6.  An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  L G Ensign; E A Gehan; D S Kamen; P F Thall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Michael Shan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-05-06       Impact factor: 2.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.