Literature DB >> 20373442

MRI-guided procedures in various regions of the body using a robotic assistance system in a closed-bore scanner: preliminary clinical experience and limitations.

Michael Moche1, Dirk Zajonz, Thomas Kahn, Harald Busse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the clinical setup and workflow of a robotic assistance system for image-guided interventions in a conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment and to report our preliminary clinical experience with percutaneous biopsies in various body regions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MR-compatible, servo-pneumatically driven, robotic device (Innomotion) fits into the 60-cm bore of a standard MR scanner. The needle placement (n = 25) accuracy was estimated by measuring the 3D deviation between needle tip and prescribed target point in a phantom. Percutaneous biopsies in six patients and different body regions were planned by graphically selecting entry and target points on intraoperatively acquired roadmap MR data.
RESULTS: For insertion depths between 29 and 95 mm, the average 3D needle deviation was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mm (range 0.9-3.8 mm). Patients with a body mass index of up to approximately 30 kg/m(2) fitted into the bore with the device. Clinical work steps and limitations are reported for the various applications. All biopsies were diagnostic and could be completed without any major complications. Median planning and intervention times were 25 (range 20-36) and 44 (36-68) minutes, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary clinical results in a standard MRI environment suggest that the presented robotic device provides accurate guidance for percutaneous procedures in various body regions. Shorter procedure times may be achievable by optimizing technical and workflow aspects. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373442     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  7 in total

1.  Reduced k-space acquisition to accelerate MR imaging of moving interventional instruments: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jens Christian Rump; Martin Jonczyk; Christian Jürgen Seebauer; Florian Streitparth; Felix Victor Güttler; Ulf Karl-Martin Teichgräber; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-guided navigation system using a needle manipulator.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamada; Junichi Tokuda; Shigeyuki Naka; Koichiro Murakami; Tohru Tani; Shigehiro Morikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Intervention Planning Using a Laser Navigation System for CT-Guided Interventions: A Phantom and Patient Study.

Authors:  Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Jan Bolck; Nagy N N Naguib; Boris Schulz; Katrin Eichler; Rene Aschenbach; Julian L Wichmann; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Concepts for augmented reality visualisation to support needle guidance inside the MRI.

Authors:  André Mewes; Florian Heinrich; Bennet Hensen; Frank Wacker; Kai Lawonn; Christian Hansen
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2018-09-18

5.  Percutaneous MR-guided interventions using an optical Moiré Phase tracking system: Initial results.

Authors:  Urte Kägebein; Frank Godenschweger; Brian S R Armstrong; Georg Rose; Frank K Wacker; Oliver Speck; Bennet Hensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Targeting Accuracy, Procedure Times and User Experience of 240 Experimental MRI Biopsies Guided by a Clinical Add-On Navigation System.

Authors:  Harald Busse; Tim Riedel; Nikita Garnov; Gregor Thörmer; Thomas Kahn; Michael Moche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Navigated MRI-guided liver biopsies in a closed-bore scanner: experience in 52 patients.

Authors:  Michael Moche; Susann Heinig; Nikita Garnov; Jochen Fuchs; Tim-Ole Petersen; Daniel Seider; Philipp Brandmaier; Thomas Kahn; Harald Busse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.