Literature DB >> 20372083

Perception and acceptance of intradermal influenza vaccination: Patient reported outcomes from phase 3 clinical trials.

Camille Reygrobellet1, Muriel Viala-Danten, Juliette Meunier, Françoise Weber, Van Hung Nguyen.   

Abstract

An intradermal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered using a microinjection system has received European marketing authorization from the European Medicine Agency. We assessed clinical trial subjects' perception of injection site reactions (ISRs) and whether ISRs affected overall acceptability of vaccination and willingness to be vaccinated in the future. A validated, self-administered, patient reported outcome questionnaire was completed 21 days after intradermal or intramuscular vaccination by elderly and non-elderly adult participants in two European randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 trials. The questionnaire addressed: the acceptability of ISRs, effect of ISRs on arm movement or sleep, satisfaction with the injection system, and willingness to be revaccinated. Questions were answered using a 5-point Likert verbal rating scale (1 = most favourable, 5 = most unfavourable response). Mean scores were calculated per group. 5,305 questionnaires were completed and analysed (95% return rate). Mean scores were close to 1 in all cases (maximum 1.68), indicating an overall favourable opinion of the vaccination and ISRs. More than 96% of participants rated ISRs after intradermal or intramuscular vaccination as either 'totally acceptable' or 'very acceptable'. Willingness to get vaccinated the following year and satisfaction with the intradermal microinjection system or the conventional intramuscular syringe were high and were not adversely affected by ISRs. ISRs after intradermal influenza vaccine administered using a microinjection system are well accepted by the vaccinees and are generally not a cause for concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20372083     DOI: 10.4161/hv.6.4.10753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin        ISSN: 1554-8600


  13 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Safety of Intradermal Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Claudia Pileggi; Valentina Mascaro; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Immunogenicity and safety of Intanza(®)/IDflu(®) intradermal influenza vaccine in South Korean adults: a multicenter, randomized trial.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Han; Jun Hee Woo; Francoise Weber; Woo Joo Kim; Kyong Ran Peck; Sang Il Kim; Young Hwa Choi; June Myung Kim
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Does Choice of Influenza Vaccine Type Change Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness in the United States? An Agent-Based Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jay V DePasse; Kenneth J Smith; Jonathan M Raviotta; Eunha Shim; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Richard K Zimmerman; Shawn T Brown
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability of three influenza vaccines in older adults: results of a randomized, controlled comparison.

Authors:  David W Scheifele; Shelly A McNeil; Brian J Ward; Marc Dionne; Curtis Cooper; Brenda Coleman; Mark Loeb; Ethan Rubinstein; Janet McElhaney; Todd Hatchette; Yan Li; Emanuele Montomoli; Amy Schneeberg; Julie A Bettinger; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Head-to-head comparison of an intradermal and a virosome influenza vaccine in patients over the age of 60: evaluation of immunogenicity, cross-protection, safety and tolerability.

Authors:  Filippo Ansaldi; Andrea Orsi; Daniela de Florentiis; Valentina Parodi; Emanuela Rappazzo; Martina Coppelli; Paolo Durando; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Intanza 15 microg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine: in older adults (aged >or=60 years).

Authors:  Sean T Duggan; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Does cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccine choice vary across the U.S.? An agent-based modeling study.

Authors:  Jay V DePasse; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Kenneth J Smith; Jonathan M Raviotta; Eunha Shim; Richard K Zimmerman; Shawn T Brown
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Potential Consequences of Not Using Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine.

Authors:  Kenneth J Smith; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Angela Wateska; Shawn T Brown; Jay V DePasse; Jonathan M Raviotta; Eunha Shim; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Intanza (®) 9 µg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine for adults 18 to 59 years of age.

Authors:  Isabel Leroux-Roels; Françoise Weber
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Phase 4 randomized trial of intradermal low-antigen-content inactivated influenza vaccine versus standard-dose intramuscular vaccine in HIV-1-infected adults.

Authors:  Filippo Ansaldi; Laura Valle; Daniela de Florentiis; Valentina Parodi; Giuseppe Murdaca; Bianca Bruzzone; Paolo Durando; Maurizio Setti; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.